Everyone has a gripe about political signs. There are too many of them, they distract drivers, they are ugly.
They are also an example of free speech, and not just any free speech but political speech, which is exactly the kind of speech the founders tried to protect when they wrote the First Amendment. State law puts limits on when and where the signs with candidates’ names can be posted. They have to come down right after Election Day, and a candidate cannot post a sign on someone else’s private property.
But towns that want to go farther should be ready to face a challenge in court, as the town of Alfred learned in a letter last week from the ACLU of Maine.
Like democracy itself, political signs can be annoying and inconvenient, but that’s the price we pay for self government.
Send questions/comments to the editors.
Success. Please wait for the page to reload. If the page does not reload within 5 seconds, please refresh the page.
Enter your email and password to access comments.
Hi, to comment on stories you must . This profile is in addition to your subscription and website login.
Already have a commenting profile? .
Invalid username/password.
Please check your email to confirm and complete your registration.
Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or login first for digital access. Here’s why.
Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.