After reading both Bill Nemitz’s opinion of Sen. Susan Collins (“Sen. Collins hardly a profile in courage during shutdown stalemate,” Oct. 2) and her office’s reply that she has a long history of bipartisanship (“Collins aide: Nemitz column insults senator’s record of bipartisanship,” Oct. 4), I could only think of one response: What have you done for me lately, Senator?
I appreciate the senator’s history of bipartisanship, her support of the Ledbetter Act, etc., but Mr. Nemitz was right to criticize her for not taking more action to end the shutdown. In business, as in politics, you’re only as good as your latest accomplishment.
But let’s not stop with Collins. Let’s take aim at the whole Maine delegation – Reps. Mike Michaud and Chellie Pingree, and Sen. Angus King – for their failure to move beyond this congressional hissy-fit and make a deal. What have they done to end the shutdown? Like the rest of Congress, they’ve done nothing.
King has been in the news calling right-wing Republicans murderers. Even if he’s correct that less health care results in more deaths, his comments hardly count as a courageous move toward bipartisan compromise and action. And Pingree and Michaud, it seems, do nothing.
Meanwhile, U.S. markets fall. The exchanges aren’t up and running. Federal workers go without pay, and taxpayers without services.
The Maine delegation’s decision to go without pay “in solidarity” with other workers is a weak attempt to mollify public anger. Unlike other federal workers, they don’t live paycheck to paycheck. Unlike other federal workers, they have the power to stop the shutdown, but they don’t.
Collins, Pingree, Michaud and King, here is some free advice. Stop talking to your adversaries through news reporters. Pick up the phone. Call your allies. Call your opponents. Then, make a deal. If you don’t, prepare to be unseated next election. If this is the best you can do, then someone else deserves a turn.
Park closed, signs say stop, blame yourself for summons
After reading the story in the Tuesday edition of the Press Herald on the park rangers issuing summonses to trespassers at Acadia National Park (“Some pay price for entering closed Acadia”), I was both amused and bothered by the comments from the woman quoted in the story.
Perhaps she didn’t fully understand the signs indicating the park was closed and not to enter, or maybe she didn’t feel they referred to her. If her comment about believing she was going to jail was not dramatic enough, she topped it off by saying she thought she was in a foreign country.
If she truly felt receiving a ticket for trespassing was the most embarrassing or intimidating thing ever in her life, she should consider herself lucky, as she has lived a charmed life.
The rangers did not shut down the park, but are left dealing with the folks who choose to ignore the signs. Put the blame where it belongs.
Obama, Senate leader Reid are childish obstructionists
Regarding Don Federman’s letter Tuesday in the Portland Press Herald (“Supporters of the tea party deserve place of their own”): Mr. Federman, it takes two to tango.
Senate President Harry Reid and President Obama are obstructionist to the nth degree, acting like small children on a playground. We are becoming a socialist country and a welfare state.
Boycott civic center over Portland Pirates travesty
What a tragic loss to the city of Portland in the situation with the Portland Pirates. This is typical of the arrogant and moronic mismanagement of the Cumberland County Civic Center. This had already been agreed upon in April. Why should it change?
I and my family will not attend any event at the civic center, and I strongly urge everyone else in Cumberland County to do the same. Maybe this loss of revenue will bring this idiotic management back to their senses!
Ordinance and tar sands oil: scare tactics vs. scary facts
I keep hearing from whose who oppose the Waterfront Protection Ordinance in South Portland that it will “sink our port,” jobs will be lost, long-existing companies will be limited, even threatened. In short, total devastation. And they say we’re using scare tactics!
I’m not saying the ordinance won’t mean some jobs are lost or some companies limited, even closed. I don’t know. I am saying that a company closing is not devastation. That is change. That is sustainability.
New jobs are created, other companies grow or new companies open. I think the best future is created by community, not by any part of the oil industry, regardless of name or size.
Devastation is what happens with a tar sands oil spill, anywhere along the 90 miles of the pipeline in Maine. Accidents happen. The oil industry doesn’t have a great safety record. Tar sands oil, according to the Environmental Protection Agency, is virtually impossible to clean up. Fishing, tourism, fresh air, drinking water, farmland are all at risk. How many families, jobs and companies would be harmed then?
Sometimes the facts are scary. And telling the truth is not the same as using scare tactics. No plans for tar sands? Portland Pipe Line had both plans and permits a few years ago. No one knew.
I am not questioning whether any corporation in South Portland has been a good neighbor or for how long. I’m just saying that their continued profit or even existence is not worth any risk of actual devastation of any part of Maine, New Hampshire or Vermont; the actual devastation of earth, air, water and the flora and fauna in each element.
Don’t live in South Portland? Talk to your friends who do. Come volunteer. Each voter in South Portland must decide. I hope you will decide to vote for the Waterfront Protection Ordinance to protect South Portland and the future of Mother Earth herself.