I found Roger Katz’s column in Monday’s Press Herald most distressing (“Maine Voices: Shifting state taxes from sales to income long overdue, Katz says”).
He appears to want to provide the financial support that Maine needs to function not from those most capable of doing so because of income, but rather from those who need to purchase goods and services – whether residents of Maine or tourists. Such a tax is regressive!
We residents will be taxed year round. The tourist season is only a few months.
How much one spends is based on one’s income. Not everyone can afford a $30,000 car, citing one of Katz’s examples. That is not a “taxable choice” for them!
The basis for a tax policy reflects one’s priorities. Apparently Mr. Katz’s – and the governor’s – are that income does not reflect one’s ability to support our state government, but consumption is. Such an outlook does not reflect a concern for human lives!
William J. Leffler II
Kennebunkport
Send questions/comments to the editors.
Success. Please wait for the page to reload. If the page does not reload within 5 seconds, please refresh the page.
Enter your email and password to access comments.
Hi, to comment on stories you must . This profile is in addition to your subscription and website login.
Already have a commenting profile? .
Invalid username/password.
Please check your email to confirm and complete your registration.
Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or login first for digital access. Here’s why.
Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.