I have been thinking about the activity of selecting presidential nominees by primaries and by caucuses.

In Maine, we used to have a caucus in each community and then send the votes to the party headquarters. In Gray, where I live, we were lucky to get 2 percent of registered party members to a Republican caucus. The actual turnout was usually about 1 percent, and I suspect that the turnout for the Democratic caucuses was similar.

More recently, we have been gathering several communities together for a caucus. I do not know the actual turnout, but I suspect it is still less than 5 percent of registered party members.

As a consequence of the caucus method, only the few active party members, perhaps less than 5 percent of all registered party members, choose the nominees. This is about the same level of citizen participation as “backroom deals.”

I suspect caucuses are used because they are much less costly than an actual statewide primary vote. Saving money, however, seems to me to be a poor reason for not using a primary system to choose nominees.

David W. Knudsen

Gray


Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or login first for digital access. Here’s why.

Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.