The nation ought to be relieved that President-elect Donald Trump has decided not to press his campaign pledge to criminally investigate rival Hillary Clinton for her handling of email while secretary of state and for the activities of the Clinton Foundation.

A drawn-out probe, fueled by Trump from the White House, would invariably become a political circus, take on the overtones of vendetta and deepen the wounds of the election. It would represent a continuation of the reckless “lock her up” chants by Trump’s campaign crowds, a mantra that suggested a Trump administration would run roughshod over the rule of law.

It would also fly in the face of the conclusion already drawn by FBI Director James Comey after a thorough investigation of Clinton’s use of a private email server while secretary of state. Comey said that no reasonable prosecutor would bring a case against Clinton based on the available evidence.

With the presidential campaign ended, Trump seems to have concluded that the legal pursuit of Clinton or former president Bill Clinton would be a legal and political loser.

“It would be very, very divisive for the country,” he told The New York Times on Tuesday. “My inclination,” he said, “would be, for whatever power I have on the matter, is to say let’s go forward.”

But even in his welcome rethinking, it was not clear that Trump understands the principle of justice insulated from political control. His statement contained only a glimmer of recognition that, as president, it should not be for him to decide whether criminal prosecutions are undertaken. The law enforcement system and the U.S. attorneys who investigate and prosecute federal crimes are supposed to be independent, free from interference by the White House or anyone else.


Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or login first for digital access. Here’s why.

Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.