Friday September 21, 2012 | 04:37 PM

The National Republican Senatorial Committee will launch a new ad criticizing independent U.S. Senate candidate Angus King and his involvement in the wind industry. 

The ad is the second by the NRSC since the primary and its third since King jumped in the race. The 30-second spot is different from its previous attack on King's involvement with Independence Wind. It features interviews with residents involved in the group that attempted to block the 22-turbine, 50-megawatt Record Hill Wind project that Independence Wind installed in Roxbury. 

The ad, dubbed "Smooth Operator," relies heavily on sentiment, using interviews from the opposition group who said the wind project sheared off the top of Record Hill and ruined their views without any tangible benefit to residents. The residents describe King as someone who made a lot of promises to the town, but didn't deliver.

The NRSC previously slammed King for a $102 million federal loan guarantee Independence Wind received to finance the project. It's unclear whether the new approach will resonate with voters.

Several polls have reported that wind energy is popular with the majority of Mainers. 

The Record Hill project was controversial with some residents in Roxbury, a town with a population of about 400. However, supporters of the project note the $610,000 windfall that the town received this year from Independence Wind. The payment dramatically reduced property taxes this year. According to a report in the Lewiston Sun Journal, residents currently pay $6.93 per $1,000 of assessed value. The mil rate was $16.86 last year.

Independence Wind also sends residents a $111 check every three months to pay their electricity bills.


About the Author

Subscribe to the
Capitol Ticker RSS

Steve Mistler covers politics and government for the Portland Press Herald. He spends a lot of time in the hallways of the State House.

Steve can be reached at 791-6345 or
On Twitter: @stevemistler

Subscribe to the
Capitol Ticker RSS

Previous entries

April 2014

March 2014

February 2014

January 2014

December 2013

November 2013


October 2013

September 2013

August 2013

July 2013

June 2013

May 2013

April 2013

March 2013

February 2013

January 2013

December 2012

November 2012

October 2012

September 2012

August 2012

July 2012

June 2012

May 2012

April 2012

Further Discussion

Here at we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)
Prefer to respond privately? Email us here.