Wednesday January 09, 2013 | 07:10 AM

For the most part, the LePage administration and the Democratic majority in the Legislature have guarded their policy agendas like nuclear launch codes.

The Dec. 5 cloture date for agencies to submit legislative requests has given some hints -- some stronger than others -- about the administration’s plans. However, details in that list of 145 bill requests have been fairly scarce. 

The governor’s budget two-year budget proposal, due Friday, will provide a better look at the administration’s policy agenda. 

Meanwhile, Democrats are expected to announce their priorities in a press conference Wednesday morning. Other than forming a committee to address the so-called workforce skills gap, the party has said very little about its plans this session. 

We’ll see if the media event -- which are typically heavy on rhetoric and light on substance -- will provide some better clues about what the Democrats hope to accomplish this session. 

— Those keeping a close eye on the bills coming out of the Revisor’s Office may have thought they had the jump on the Democrats’ first official policy initiative when LD 1 was made public on Tuesday. 

The bill, sponsored by Sen. John Patrick, D-Rumford, makes changes to the state’s workers compensation act. Workers compensation bills are often a flash point between the two parties, Patrick is no stranger to stirring the pot and in past sessions LD 1 has been a tone-setter for the session -- the vehicle for the majority party’s policy priority. In other words, LD 1 is usually a big deal. 

Democrats say this LD 1 isn’t. 

According to a spokeswoman for Senate President Justin Alfond, Patrick’s bill is a housekeeping bill that will help bring into compliance the workers compensation reforms passed by last session’s Republican majority. 

— Department of Health and Human Services Commissioner Mary Mayhew is scheduled to appear before the Legislature’s budget writing committee on Wednesday to brief lawmakers on the $13.4 million cuts to her agency. 

The cuts are part of the governor’s $35.5 million across-the-board state spending reductions that have been ordered to help balance the state’s current two-year budget. 

Mayhew will likely receive a lot of questions about the impact of the cuts, which hit an array of social services programs for the elderly, the mentally ill, substance abusers and the poor. 

It will be interesting to see how hard Democratic lawmakers push Mayhew. So far there seems to be a reluctance among Democrats to challenge too many of the measures included in the governor’s curtailment order, in part because state law limits his discretionary cutting power. 

The real battles in the budget committee won’t likely occur until it begins digging into the governor’s two-year budget proposal. 

So far, rumblings from the administration have been that the budget contain has plenty of bad news for everybody, particularly DHHS. 

— Tuesday’s news that the federal government had approved two out of four cuts to the state’s Medicaid program was accompanied by the usual spin. The LePage administration championed the approved reductions and the last Legislature’s “courage” to pass the cuts without first gaining federal approval. 

Democrats, meanwhile, ripped the governor and Republicans for passing illegal Medicaid cuts with a “false savings” that left a budget hole for this Legislature to plug. 

The bottom line: The feds’ announcement was a split decision that eliminates health care coverage for approximately 20,000 low-income Mainers and saved the state about $4.5 million of the $23 million lawmakers booked in savings last year.  

Additionally, majority of Democrats agreed to one of the four Medicaid reductions in a bipartisan budget bill passed last session. 

About the Author

Subscribe to the
Capitol Ticker RSS

Steve Mistler covers politics and government for the Portland Press Herald. He spends a lot of time in the hallways of the State House.

Steve can be reached at 791-6345 or
On Twitter: @stevemistler

Subscribe to the
Capitol Ticker RSS

Previous entries

April 2014

March 2014

February 2014

January 2014

December 2013

November 2013


October 2013

September 2013

August 2013

July 2013

June 2013

May 2013

April 2013

March 2013

February 2013

January 2013

December 2012

November 2012

October 2012

September 2012

August 2012

July 2012

June 2012

May 2012

April 2012

Further Discussion

Here at we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)
Prefer to respond privately? Email us here.