st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) } /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table" /> st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) } /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table" /> st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) } /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table" />
Thursday November 17, 2011 | 03:51 PM

Legislation approving a $500,000 study of whether to designate the York River part of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System is a step away from a House floor vote.

The House Committee on Natural Resources today approved by voice vote Rep. Chellie Pingree’s bill authorizing the study, which would take up to three years and would be overseen by the National Park Service and conducted by local organizations.

A Wild and Scenic Rivers designation could mean more federal funding to protect wildlife, and more scrutiny of river projects such as dredging or dams, but wouldn’t interfere with private property rights, Pingree’s office has said.

“We’ve cleared this hurdle because the York River community has done such a great job of showing how important the character of this waterway is to the local environment, economy, and way of life,” Pingree, D-1st District, said in a statement.  “The study will be an excellent opportunity to find out more about the value of the York River, while giving a critical boost to the local organizations and businesses who will do the research.”

The study would determine whether the 11-mile-long river that flows from York Pond in Eliot to York Harbor merits one of three Wild and Scenic River designations: wild, scenic or recreational.

The bill was only passed, however, after an amendment was added by GOP Rep. Rob Bishop of Utah, the chairman of of the subcommittee on national parks, forests and public lands, requiring the study measure the impact of a wild and scenic river designation on such activities as fishing, hunting and bridge building.

Pingree said amendment “makes the legislation stronger. It’s important that community members have all the information they need to decide whether they think the designation should move forward.”

The only other Maine waterway in the 203-river system is the Allagash in northern Maine.

About this Blog

Subscribe to the
Maine on the Hill RSS

About the Author

Kevin Miller is Washington bureau chief for the Portland Press Herald and MaineToday Media. He has worked as a journalist in Maine for 6 ½ years, covering the environment, politics and the State House. Before arriving in Maine, he wrote about politics, government and education for newspapers in Virginia and Maryland.
Kevin can be reached at 317-6256 or

Subscribe to the
Maine on the Hill RSS

Previous entries

March 2014

February 2014

January 2014

December 2013

November 2013

October 2013


September 2013

August 2013

July 2013

June 2013

May 2013

April 2013

March 2013

February 2013

January 2013

December 2012

November 2012

October 2012

September 2012

April 2012

March 2012

February 2012

January 2012

December 2011

November 2011

October 2011

September 2011

August 2011

July 2011

June 2011

May 2011

April 2011

March 2011

February 2011

Further Discussion

Here at we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)
Prefer to respond privately? Email us here.