October 4, 2013

Recent buyer now aims to ‘flip’ disputed Bath property

The developer who purchased the former Mid Coast Hospital for $799,000 is listing it for twice what he paid.

By J. Craig Anderson canderson@pressherald.com
Staff Writer

(Continued from page 1)

click image to enlarge

Bath officials sold the former Mid Coast Hospital, valued at $6.5 million by the city assessor’s office, for $799,000 in April after receiving an offer from a Phippsburg-based developer. The property was never listed for sale.

Gabe Souza / Staff Photographer

“I am quite confident that that property will not sell at that price,” Mateosian said. “But you never know. Stranger things have happened.”

Bath City Councilor Carolyn Lockwood agreed that a listing is not the same as a sale, and that what matters is how much Smith actually gets for the property.

“I could put my house on the market for a million bucks,” she said.

Lockwood said the council would be keeping a close eye on the listing to see what the ultimate sale price will be. Still, she said the council believed it was doing the right thing for the city when it agreed unanimously to sell the property.

“It’s very easy to have 20/20 hindsight,” she said.

According to documents obtained by the Portland Press Herald through a Freedom of Access Act request, Bath officials hired Don Spann, a Topsham-based commercial real estate broker, on April 3 to act as Bath’s broker for the property at 9 Park St.

The contract says the property’s list price would be $799,999 and that Spann would receive a commission of 7 percent.

According to the contract, Spann’s agreement to act as broker was not to begin until April 10. The buyer, Smith, signed a contract that same day to buy the property for $799,000 – about $1,000 less than the price in Spann’s broker agreement.

That day, Spann signed a waiver with the Maine Listings multiple listing service stating that he did not want the property listed for sale.

According to the Maine Listings waiver, listing a property with the service tends to bring a higher sale price because more than 670 agencies and 4,100 agents and brokers in the state get access to the listing.

Wischkaemper, Scott and others have questioned why Spann did not list the property on the multiple listing service or give other potential buyers a chance to beat Smith’s offer.

They say the timing of the sale gives the appearance that Smith had advance knowledge that the property was to be sold and was working directly with Spann.

Wischkaemper said it’s unlikely that Smith could have done all the necessary due diligence to buy a large commercial property in the five business days from April 3 to April 10.

Sue Spann, the wife of Don Spann and a co-owner of Re/Max Riverside real estate brokerage, said her husband is prohibited from talking to the media because of a confidentiality agreement with the city.

However, she said her husband did not tell Smith the former hospital was for sale, suggesting instead that it might have been a city employee who told him.

Sue Spann, who is also a real estate broker, said the city could have priced the property for as much as $1.2 million but that it likely would have sat on the market a lot longer.

“The city knew it was the prime time to sell that property” because of the departing tenants, she said.

Sue Spann also noted that it was the city’s decision, not her husband’s, to accept Smith’s offer without listing the property first.

When city officials first announced the sale, they noted that Smith has a track record for buying older properties and improving them. However, the listing for Mid Coast Center does not mention any improvements made since he purchased it.

In September, the city released a document to the public showing that Mid Coast Center’s four largest tenants were paying a total of $456,000 a year in rent.

At first, the city attempted to withhold the document, saying it was drafted in preparation for a closed, executive session by the city council.

However, the council voted Sept. 18 to “waive” the executive session, thus giving the city permission to publish the memo.

Scott, Wischkaemper and others launched a recall effort in August against some members of the council, based in large part on the city’s refusal to release documents related to the executive session.

The recall effort was suspended after the council reconsidered that decision.

J. Craig Anderson can be contacted at 207-719-6390 or:




Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors

Further Discussion

Here at PressHerald.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)