Friday, April 18, 2014
By LaYLAN COPELIN Austin American-Statesman
(Continued from page 1)
Robert Mayfield owns several Dairy Queen restaurants, including this one in Austin, Texas, but is delaying opening another one because of the confusion surrounding new health care legislation.
Austin American-Statesman / McClatchy Newspapers
• Oct. 1: All employers – whether they provide health insurance or not – must notify employees about the Affordable Care Act.
• 2014: Employers must determine whether they are "large" or "small" employers based on whether they have 50 or more full-time equivalent employees.
• 2015: The employer mandate begins, requiring large businesses to offer health insurance or face penalties.
EMPLOYER MANDATES: WHO'S AFFECTED?
• Large employers with 50 or more full-time equivalent employees must either offer health insurance to full-time employees and their dependents or face a penalty of $2,000 per employee (minus the first 30 full-time employees).
• Dependents are defined as children up to age 26. Spouses aren't considered dependents.
• Small employers with fewer than 50 full-time equivalent employees aren't required to offer health insurance.
• Full-time employees are defined as those who work 30 hours or more per week.
• Employers don't have to provide insurance to part-time employees (29 hours or less), but they have to compute the total number of hours worked by all part-time and seasonal employees to determine whether an employer is large (50 or more full-time equivalents) or not.
Richie Jackson, chief operating officer of the Texas Restaurant Association, said his members typically don't have the sales to support benefits for workers. He said a restaurant averages $79,000 a year in sales per employee as compared with big-box retailers who have about $750,000 per worker.
Still, Jackson said, "Most operators have reached the conclusion that they don't want to pay the penalties; they want to provide coverage."
Even if most employers do opt to offer the coverage, that doesn't mean all employees will be covered.
Under the law, employees who work 29 hours or less per week don't have to be covered. Jackson said two-thirds of restaurant workers are considered part-time, but a study of Houston eateries says employees averaged 32 hours.
That has led to reports of employers reducing their workers' hours to make them part-timers under the law.
Mayfield said a lot of his employees work overtime.
"I don't want my employees to have a 25 percent pay cut," Mayfield said. "If you are cutting hours for people who have worked for you for 10 years, that would hurt me."
On the other hand, Mayfield said he isn't sure he can afford to provide insurance – or the fines for not providing it.
Jackson said most restaurant owners are trying to identify critical workers who would be full-time with benefits and the others who should be part-timers without benefits.
Haff, the consultant, said employers should also be aware of a wrinkle in the law dealing with part-time or seasonal employees who might be entitled to insurance.
All of a company's part-time hours must be totaled to determine full-time equivalent employees.
Some "small" business owners who think they are below the 50-worker limit might find that they have 50 or more full-time equivalents and must provide insurance.
There also are broader issues for employers who offer health insurance to their employees.
Ruffing said all employers who offer insurance should be asking: "Do I continue to offer my plan? Or dial it back? Will the plan attract the talent I need and can I continue to afford it?" She said 20 percent to 25 percent of her clients have more than 50 employees and will be required to provide insurance or face fines by 2015.
Ruffing said one of her clients didn't realize that half of his 120 employees don't take his company's insurance. But what happens – and at what cost – if they suddenly all sign up?
That's what David Norris, owner of Norris Conference Center, must be prepared to address.
He has 75 employees at his five conference centers around the state, including one in Austin. Today, at least a third of his employees are covered by health insurance, and the company pays 80 percent of the premium.
As his whole workforce becomes eligible for insurance, Norris anticipates paying 60 percent of the premium – the minimum under the law. But because the company could be covering more employees, Norris said his share of the bill still will increase from $120,000 a year to at least $200,000.
His employees who previously were covered will see their premiums double, and the new employees – many of whom are making near the minimum wage – could see $200 to $300 in monthly premiums.
"They were shocked," Norris said. "I felt bad. It will put a greater burden on our employees."
The health care law doesn't require so-called "smaller" employers with fewer than 50 employees to offer insurance. But the law offers temporary tax credits to encourage smaller companies to provide insurance.
David Campbell, who owns Austin Pallet Co., said it will still be too expensive for him – and for his 25 low-wage employees.
"Most of my guys would rather have a little higher paycheck," he said.
He said the new law's mandated coverage – everything from mental health to substance abuse treatment – drives up the cost.
Campbell, 61, said he doesn't have insurance for his family or for his workers who might get hurt on the job.
"I spend a lot of money just taking people to the doctor," he said.