ADVERTISEMENT

June 26, 2013

2012 Bloomberg file photo

On Tuesday, the Facebook page of Men’s Wearhouse was full of comments criticizing the company for ousting founder George Zimmer, above.

Company: Zimmer caused split

The Associated Press

NEW YORK - Men's Wearhouse escalated a public battle with its founder and former pitchman George Zimmer on Tuesday, trying to explain why it fired the man who still represents the clothier in many shoppers' minds.

The company said in a statement that its board parted ways with Zimmer because he had difficulty "accepting the fact that Men's Wearhouse is a public company with an independent board of directors and that he has not been the chief executive officer for two years." One bone of contention was that he wanted to sell the company to an investment firm.

On paper, Zimmer's ability to take back control of the company he founded seems limited. But to his fans, he's already winning. Customers are turning to the company's Facebook and other social media outlets to express their outrage. Many were threatening to boycott the chain.

Ultimately, the shoppers themselves could determine what happens next. Zimmer, 64, who founded the company in 1973, has been one of advertising's most recognizable pitchmen, using the slogan "You're going to like the way you look. I guarantee it."

"I am kind of sad," said Gerard McLean, 51, a Web developer from Dayton, Ohio. "George Zimmer is a trusted face and voice. Men need to hear that their fashion choices are OK."

McLean said he'll continue to shop there. But he fears the stores' no-nonsense fashion choices may fade and drive him elsewhere. "My concern is that (Men's Wearhouse) will start listening to advice dispensed by the GQ crowd," he said.

Since Men's Wearhouse's terse announcement last Wednesday of Zimmer's firing as executive chairman, it had remained silent about the reasons.

But on Tuesday, Men's Wearhouse said Zimmer, who owns just 3 ½ percent of the company's stock, pushed for "significant changes that would enable him to regain control." The chain said Zimmer had refused to support CEO Doug Ewert and other senior managers unless they gave in to his demands.

The retailer also said Zimmer expected veto power over certain corporate decisions, such as executive compensation, even though it has an independent board committee that sets such policies.

Analysts had speculated that the rift was caused by a power struggle. Last week, Zimmer said in a written statement that over the past several months he and the board have disagreed about the direction of Men's Wearhouse. At the time, Zimmer said the board chose to silence his concerns. On Monday, Zimmer sent a letter to the company saying he was quitting the board.

In addition, Men's Wearhouse said Zimmer also began arguing for a sale of the business to an investment group, reversing course on his previous position.

Men's Wearhouse said its board unanimously agrees that now is not the time to sell the company. The chain said a deal to go private could load the company down with debt.

Zimmer declined to comment for this story.

Investors may have seized on the hint of a potential buyout in Tuesday's revelations and sent the company's stock up 5 percent. The surge came after four straight days of declines. Analysts also said investors may have felt some closure from the company's clarification of the reasons for the firing.

David Johnson, CEO of Strategic Visions LLC, a branding company, said the board should have come clean with the story last week instead of coming out with it days later. It smacks of bad taste, he said.

"(George Zimmer) has won the PR war already. They look cold and heartless," Johnson said.

Robert Passikoff, president of Brand Keys Inc., a New York customer research firm, agreed.

"Airing boardroom dirty laundry doesn't work for consumers," Passikoff said. "It matters internally, not externally. The reason people are reacting emotionally is because they bonded to the brand via the man."

Founders who have wanted to gain back some control have found mixed success. Last year, Best Buy's co-founder and former Chairman Richard Schulze tried to take over the consumer electronics company with the aid of private equity firms. He didn't succeed, but in March, he returned to the Best Buy fold as chairman emeritus.

A key difference from Zimmer's situation: Schulze owned 20 percent of Best Buy. But his quest to regain control also didn't register with shoppers because he wasn't the public face of the brand.

On Tuesday, the Facebook page of Men's Wearhouse was covered with hundreds of comments from shoppers who lashed out at the company for ousting the founder. Many said they would stop shopping there.

Men's Wearhouse said Tuesday that it didn't want a total breakdown of its relationship with Zimmer and that it wasn't trying to hurt him. The company said it made "considerable efforts" to find a solution that kept Zimmer involved in the business, but he wouldn't accept anything other than full control.





Further Discussion

Here at PressHerald.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)


  • Back to Business

News
Sports
Politics
Opinion
Life & Culture
People

© 2014 The Portland Press Herald - All Rights Reserved.
MaineToday Media
One City Center, 5th floor, Portland, ME 04101-5009
(207) 791-6650
contact@pressherald.com