October 4, 2010

Forms detail Richardson campaign's alleged fraud

The records are the basis of a probe into claims of falsifying donor records.

By BETTY ADAMS Kennebec Journal

AUGUSTA - Over several weeks, state ethics regulators waded through hundreds of records filed by the gubernatorial campaign of John Richardson before denying his application for public campaign funds.

click image to enlarge

John Richardson

Related headlines

EDITOR’S NOTE

ON SEPT. 22, the Maine Commission on Governmental Ethics and Election Practices surrendered its public records on the gubernatorial campaign of John Richardson to the Kennebec Journal, in order to settle a public access lawsuit brought by the newspaper.

TODAY’S STORY is the second of a two-part examination of the documents.

These documents became the basis of an investigation into the Brunswick Democrat's campaign by the Attorney General's Office, which ended last month with charges against four volunteer circulators for allegedly falsifying contribution records.

The documents and related correspondence were released by the state Sept. 21; in return, the Kennebec Journal dropped a lawsuit it had filed to obtain them, after the newspaper's repeated requests under Maine's Freedom of Access Act had been repeatedly denied by the Maine Commission on Governmental Ethics and Election Practices.

Investigators focused on anomalies in one specific record -- "Receipt and Acknowledgement" forms for qualifying contributions under Maine's Clean Election Act -- during the inquiry.

The forms attest that circulators collected $5 donations from registered voters, that the $5 came from personal funds, and that the circulator watched as the voter signed the R&A form.

The state maintains that the four Richardson circulators signed these forms knowing they did not receive the $5 contribution from the voter or were not present when the voter signed the form.

In some cases, the state claims circulators provided the $5 donation from their own personal funds or perhaps from funds provided by the campaign.

These alleged offenses occurred in March, in the run-up to the campaign's April 1 deadline for submitting 3,250 contributions of $5 each to the ethics commission.

LORI A. LEVESQUE

The Richardson campaign submitted R&A forms submitted by a circulator in Fort Kent -- later identified as Lori A. Levesque, 46, of Fort Kent -- listing 155 qualifying contributions.

Record checkers contacted 66 people named as contributors: Twenty-eight said they never contributed $5, though their signatures were on the R&A form.

Aroostook County Sheriff's Department Detective Daniel Richardson then investigated the claims, and his findings form the basis of the eight counts of unsworn falsification pending against Levesque in District Court in Fort Kent.

The charge says, "Levesque did make a false written statement which she did not believe to be true on a form or the receipt and acknowledgement of qualifying contributions in support of" Richardson's request for public campaign funding.

It says the intent was to deceive the ethics commission staff.

A letter to Richardson from the commission says Levesque was paid for "campaign field work."

The letter, sent April 22, adds, "It is unclear whether those funds were used to pay the face value of money orders submitted with these R&A forms."

Levesque did not return two phone messages seeking comment. She received a summons from the sheriff's office and is scheduled for a hearing Oct. 15 at 9 a.m., according to a clerk in Fort Kent District Court.

Under Maine statute, unsworn falsification, a misdemeanor, can carry a maximum jail sentence of 364 days and a fine of up to $2,000.

DENISE ALTVATER

Richardson's campaign also submitted 34 qualifying contributions from voters on forms signed by a circulator in Perry, later identified as Denise Altvater, 51, of Perry.

Commission staff contacted 17 of those people: Eight of them said they did not make a $5 contribution and were not asked to make one.

The same April 22 letter to Richardson says, "In a subsequent telephone interview with commission staff, the circulator admitted that someone else approached 15 of the people listed on these R&A forms, and that these people were not asked to make a contribution initially."

The Perry circulator went back to collect the contributions from all but five, and submitted the forms anyway, the letter indicates.

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors




Further Discussion

Here at PressHerald.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)