January 30, 2011

Art Review: No smoke, but lots of mirrors in fun ICA show


Contemporary art is unpredictable. Sometimes it is dark and difficult, but every once in a while contemporary art is smart, fun and accessible to everyone -- like the show about mirrors now on view at the Maine College of Art's Institute of Contemporary Art.

click image to enlarge

Rozin’s “Peg Mirror,” 2007

Courtesy of the Vince Irwin Collection

click image to enlarge

Alyson Shotz’s “Arnolfini 360 Degrees x 12,” 2006

Courtesy of the artist and Derek Eller Gallery, New York

Additional Photos Below



WHERE: The ICA at MECA, 522 Congress St., Portland

WHEN: Through April 10

HOURS: 11 a.m. to 5 p.m. Wednesday to Sunday; until 7 p.m. Thursday

INFO: 699-5029; www.meca.edu/ica

WHAT ELSE: An artists' talk will be held at 3:30 p.m. Feb. 10. Screenings of a short film and artist videos will be Feb. 17, March 17 and April 7.

"Fracturing the Burning Glass: Between Mirror and Meaning" is an agonizing title, but the exhibition, I assure you, is anything but. "Mirrors" features 11 installations and works by four artists: Gwenael Belanger, Susan Leopold, Daniel Rozin and Alyson Shotz.

The most exciting are works by Rozin. His "Peg Mirror" features several hundred wooden dowels whose tips have been cut at an angle. When you stand in front of the piece, a tiny camera at its center instructs the pegs to spin so that your form is marked by pegs slanted in a particular direction.

The rumbling of the pegs as they respond to your movements is charming in itself, but as you see how they are mirroring you, "Peg" moves from fun to phenomenal.

It's almost impossible not to play in front of "Peg Mirror," but the piece turns you into a child in another key way. You don't immediately recognize the piece as a mirror -- rather, you have to discover it.

This sense of discovery echoes Jacques Lacan's "mirror stage," a transcendent developmental threshold when a child can discover his individual subjectivity by recognizing himself in a mirror. Following Lacan, this theme is pervasive in literary theory and contemporary art.

Rozin's other pieces are no less exciting. In an elegantly darkened room, bits of digital white "snow" flow down through a black field. Moments after your arrival, an image slowly forms, and dissolves unless you stand still. Subtly and barely, it's you.

There is little doubt, however, that "Mirror's" crowd pleaser will be Rozin's irresistible "Weave Mirror," in which 768 paper cylinders, each with its own little motor, dutifully spin to present your image on an impressive contraption hanging from the ceiling like a futuristic midair painting. The smartly organized grid of electronics on the back of the piece beckons attention as well with a few red lights, reminding the viewer that it is hard at work.

The most ambitious piece in the show, Leopold's "The Yellow Wallpaper," is an installation within a small, mirrored space. She uses three cameras, but this time to project domestic interior imagery onto something like a large, spinning dollhouse. Ladders reach up through the spaces, peppered with tiny windows, doors and mirrors.

The installation's surrounding mirrors add a dizzying but energized sense of movement that fascinates in contrast to the stop-motion sense of subjectivity when you catch yourself gazing back at yourself again and again in the many and varied mirrors surrounding the space.

Leopold's piece is based on the 1892 text "The Yellow Wallpaper" by Charlotte Perkins Gilmore. While I think the feminist ideas at stake are both interesting and important, Leopold's work does nothing with the content but reference the story.

It's not enough simply to reference theoretical concepts or arcane texts. A work that doesn't throw light on a reference only comes across as empty name-dropping. As a kinetic sculpture, "The Yellow Wallpaper" is terrific. In terms of Gilmore's text, it's disappointing.

I feel the same way about Shotz's "Arnolfini 360 Degrees x 12." The group of 12 fish-eye mirrors really pops. You see the other 11 mirrors in each of them and then again reflected inside the other reflections, and so on. It's a cool example of parabolic or fractal mathematics, but it's wounded by the title, which references -- without otherwise commenting on -- an important 1434 painting by Jan van Eyck that features a convex mirror as a heartfelt metaphor for the Christian artist's omniscient God. Forcing a reading of the van Eyck only makes the Shotz seem slick and snide.

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors

Additional Photos

click image to enlarge

Gwenael Belanger’s “Carré gris” (left), 2010, and Daniel Rozin’s “Weave Mirror,” 2007

click image to enlarge

Alyson Shotz’s “Luminous Harmonic,” 2008

Courtesy of the artist and Derek Eller Gallery, New York


Further Discussion

Here at PressHerald.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)



More PPH Blogs