December 14, 2011

Natural Foodie: New management promises changes at DeCoster

By Avery Yale Kamila akamila@mainetoday.com
Staff Writer

Maine's problem-plagued egg production farm is under new management.

click image to enlarge

A worker at DeCoster Egg Farms, above, works in one of the company’s many chicken barns, where thousands of birds are kept.

Press Herald file

click image to enlarge

At left, a chicken stretches its featherless neck through the wire of its cage as a visitor passes by. The birds are kept four to a cage and spend their lives standing on a wire floor. The egg farm’s new operators say they plan to be “a highly responsible operator, a strong economic contributor, and a good neighbor” in Maine. Critics of the company, however, say they doubt much will change.

Press Herald file

Last month, Moark, a subsidiary of the privately owned Land O'Lakes, entered into a 10-year lease agreement to run the former DeCoster Egg Farms. At the end of the term, Moark will have an option to buy the company.

This announcement came just weeks before company founder Austin "Jack" DeCoster and his son, Peter, revealed they were exiting the egg business and relinquishing control of all operations in Maine, Iowa and Ohio.

The move by the DeCosters followed a 2010 nationwide salmonella outbreak that sickened an estimated 1,900 people and led to the recall of 550 million eggs. Investigators traced the source of the outbreak to DeCoster's egg barns and contaminated feed operations in Iowa.

The departure of DeCoster sounds like good news to critics. Yet questions remain. Will the new management be any better? And is it possible to operate a factory-scale farm in a sustainable and humane manner?

Since its founding in 1961, the Maine egg farm has been fined and sued multiple times for its treatment of workers, animals and the environment.

Some of the farm's more recent transgressions caused it to be slapped with a $2 million fine for unsafe working conditions, a $143,500 fine for improper disposal of chicken feces, a $3.2 million class-action lawsuit settlement related to illegal worker housing conditions, and a $125,000 penalty following an undercover video that revealed widespread animal abuses at the farm.

The farm consists of more than 80 chicken barns and related facilities spread over properties in Turner, Leeds and Winthrop. The state estimates that it houses up to 4.5 million chickens, while Moark puts the number at 3.6 million. Whatever the figure, this is not only the largest egg producing farm in Maine (the next largest is home to roughly 10,000 hens), but also the biggest in New England.

"It's going to be business as usual" at the farm, said Daniel Hauff, who directs investigations at Chicago-based Mercy for Animals, which led the 2009 undercover investigation at the former DeCoster farm that documented extensive animal abuse. "Moark has its own history of cruelty."

Hauff pointed to a 2005 undercover video shot at a Moark egg farm in Missouri, which showed a worker disposing of live chickens in a trash can. As a result, Moark was ordered to pay $100,000 to the Humane Society of Missouri. Similar practices at the former DeCoster Egg Farm were documented during Mercy for Animals' undercover investigation.

According to a statement from Land O'Lakes spokesperson Jeanne Forbis, "an outside service crew inappropriately handled the hen euthanization process. Moark dismissed the service company and now only utilizes Moark employees in this process."

One of the biggest criticisms leveled by animal welfare groups relates to both DeCoster's and Moark's use of "battery cages" to house hens. Battery cages typically house four to five birds in crowded wire enclosures where the chickens don't have enough room to stretch their wings. That practice will continue under the new ownership.

"The problems you find in the egg industry and particularly the battery cage industry are the exact problems that caused the salmonella outbreak -- confining animals in such small spaces in filth allows disease to thrive," Hauff said. "If they really cared about the hens, they would get rid of the battery cages. But these companies are all about profits, and the first thing that goes is animal welfare."

Paul Shapiro, director of the farm animal protection division at the Humane Society of the United States, said, "documented studies show that cage-free operations have lower rates of salmonella than caged operations." Both California and the European Union have banned the use of battery cages.

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors




Further Discussion

Here at PressHerald.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)




 

Blogs

More PPH Blogs