September 21, 2013

High court asked to take up contraceptive coverage issue

Tribune Washington Bureau

WASHINGTON - The Obama administration set the stage Thursday for another Supreme Court showdown on the president's health care law, this time to decide whether for-profit companies can be forced to provide full contraceptive coverage for their employees despite religious objections from their owners.

The administration's lawyers asked the justices to take up the issue this fall to decide whether these corporations can claim a religious exemption to this part of the health care law.

U.S. Solicitor General Donald Verrilli Jr. called the issue one of "exceptional importance" that needs to be resolved soon.

Dozens of employers across the country have sued to challenge the so-called "contraceptive mandate" in the new law. Large employers are required to provide health coverage, and the law says this insurance must pay for standard contraceptives, including the "morning after" pill.

But some employers object on religious grounds. They went to court, arguing that they cannot be compelled by the government to subsidize birth control or abortions. Their legal claims rested both on the First Amendment's protection for the "free exercise of religion" and a federal law known as the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, a measure meant to strengthen religious liberty.

The challengers include the Green family from Oklahoma who own and operate the Hobby Lobby Stores, a chain of more than 500 arts-and-crafts stores. They won a preliminary victory in the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver, which had the effect of blocking enforcement of the mandate. But the 3rd Circuit in Philadelphia and the 6th Circuit in Cincinnati rejected similar claims from other employers.Tribune Washington Bureau

WASHINGTON - The Obama administration set the stage Thursday for another Supreme Court showdown on the president's health care law, this time to decide whether for-profit companies can be forced to provide full contraceptive coverage for their employees despite religious objections from their owners.

The administration's lawyers asked the justices to take up the issue this fall to decide whether these corporations can claim a religious exemption to this part of the health care law.

U.S. Solicitor General Donald Verrilli Jr. called the issue one of "exceptional importance" that needs to be resolved soon.

Dozens of employers across the country have sued to challenge the so-called "contraceptive mandate" in the new law. Large employers are required to provide health coverage, and the law says this insurance must pay for standard contraceptives, including the "morning after" pill.

But some employers object on religious grounds. They went to court, arguing that they cannot be compelled by the government to subsidize birth control or abortions. Their legal claims rested both on the First Amendment's protection for the "free exercise of religion" and a federal law known as the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, a measure meant to strengthen religious liberty.

The challengers include the Green family from Oklahoma who own and operate the Hobby Lobby Stores, a chain of more than 500 arts-and-crafts stores that employs more than 13,000 full-time workers.

They won a preliminary victory in the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver, which had the effect of blocking enforcement of the mandate. But the 3rd Circuit in Philadelphia and the 6th Circuit in Cincinnati rejected similar claims from other employers.

The cases have raised two large issues: Is a for-profit corporation a "person" protected under the religious-freedom laws? And can a corporation have religious beliefs?

The Green family argues that because they are people, and they own the chain of stores, the family's religious beliefs deserve protection.

The administration's lawyers argued, however, that it would be "unprecedented" for a court to extend religious exemptions to corporations. No court has "accepted a claim that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act enables a for-profit corporate employer to exempt itself from generally applicable employment regulations," Verrilli said.

These cases involving corporate employers are separate from suits involving schools and hospitals that have religious affiliations. The administration has given those employers a limited exemption from the law.

Lawyers for the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty agreed that the administration's action means the high court will likely rule on the issue in the upcoming term.

"The United States government is taking the remarkable position that private individuals lose their religious freedom when they make a living," said Kyle Duncan, general counsel for the group, which also represents the Hobby Lobby stores. "We're confident that the Supreme Court will reject the government's extreme position and hold that religious liberty is for everyone - including people who run a business."

 

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors




Further Discussion

Here at PressHerald.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)