September 25, 2013

Report criticizes DEP as Maine's lake-water quality dips

The Natural Resources Council of Maine cites cuts in staffing and funding for programs.

By North Cairn
Staff Writer

The Maine Department of Environmental Protection is systematically and deliberately dismantling successful programs designed to protect Maine's lakes, environmental advocates said Tuesday.

Today's poll: Lake protection

Are you concerned that cuts to a DEP lake protection program will prove harmful to Maine lakes?



View Results

click image to enlarge

Sabattus Pond near Lewiston shows an algae bloom, which occurs there frequently because of runoff from farms and residential lots around the pond, according to the Natural Resources Council of Maine.

Courtesy Natural Resources Council of Maine

Related Documents

Read the Natural Resources Council of Maine report
Read the UMaine report on Maine lake water quality

In a 14-page report, the Natural Resources Council of Maine documents several criticisms of the DEP, including cuts in staffing and funding for lake protection.

Internal emails and audits of staffing and departmental activities demonstrate a pattern in the DEP to disrupt and eliminate lake water-quality programs and impede collaboration with academic, scientific and public information efforts, the report says.

"There has been a significant decline in what was once the crown jewel of Maine," its lakes and lake protection programs, said Pete Didisheim, advocacy director for the Natural Resources Council of Maine.

Didisheim said DEP staffing and funding for lake protection is at the lowest level in decades. Vacant positions have not been filled, the DEP's Lake Protection Fund has been cut from $144,000 to $122,000, and in 2011 about $34,000 that was earmarked for invasive-plant management was transferred to the general fund.

The report, "Troubled Waters: Damage to Maine's Lake Protection Program Under the LePage Administration," was written to address practices in the DEP that the environmental group says have put unreasonable constraints on the environmental protection of the state's lakes, Didisheim said.

"There can always be some improvements," said Jessamine Logan, director of communications for the DEP, but the department is making progress with lake water quality.

"Seven hundred acres of lakes have improved their water quality in the last two years," she said.

The message of the council's report was supported by Matt Scott, the retired chief biologist for the DEP who created the department's lakes program in the 1970s.

Scott said the state has stepped back from its commitment to lakes by vastly reducing staffing and by reorganizing and refocusing the state's environmental work.

According to the report, the DEP once had 6.5 positions dedicated to lake protection, support from the staff in shoreland zoning and the Natural Resources Protection Act programs, a lakes education position and an AmeriCorps volunteer for lake education and school programs.

The staff is now down to a full-time biologist, a biologist who works part-time on lakes protection and a part-time conservation aide who is shared with the marine program, the report says. Vacant positions have not been filled and staff members who worked in the lakes program have been reassigned.

The AmeriCorps position was also eliminated under the Le- Page administration.

Scott said, "DEP was the leader in the lakes program in the beginning, (but) the department is not focusing on lakes and the lakes program (now), because they don't have the staff."

An early investigation into the details of the report showed that some of the information portrayed DEP decisions and actions in a light that does not reflect reality, Logan said.

"Some things are just factually incorrect," she said. "Some ... are out of context."

The report, she said, does not reflect the DEP's interaction and public participation. She pointed to its work with the Cooperative Extension Service, the Lakes Environmental Association and the Maine Volunteer Lake Monitoring Program as examples.

Cuts to lake programs have occurred before, in part because environmental advocacy for Maine's 5,000 lakes is not as strong as that for marine and coastal programs and sportsmen's concerns, said Peter Lowell, executive director of the 1,200-member Lakes Environmental Association in Bridgton.

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors

Further Discussion

Here at we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)

Today's poll: Lake protection

Are you concerned that cuts to a DEP lake protection program will prove harmful to Maine lakes?



View Results