June 25, 2013

Ala. leaders pleased by voting rights ruling

But one black Alabama leader says, 'I'm very disappointed with it. Disappointed isn't even the word for it.'

The Associated Press

CALERA, Ala. — Alabama's governor and other state leaders praised a Supreme Court ruling on Tuesday that halts the use of a key provision in the Voting Rights Act.

click image to enlarge

Calera City Council member Ernest Montgomery sits in the council chamber in Calera, Ala., Tuesday, June 25, 2013. A ruling by a deeply divided Supreme Court on Tuesday halted enforcement of the federal government's most potent tool to stop voting discrimination over the past half century, saying it does not reflect racial progress. Montgomery, a lifelong resident of Shelby County, said he wouldn't have ever been elected to his seat on the Calera City Council without the voting rights act. (AP Photo/Dave Martin)

Related headlines

The high court's ruling on a legal challenge by Shelby County was hailed that county's lawyer, Gov. Robert Bentley, the state's attorney general and the speaker of the House. They say that the ruling means Alabama can make its own decisions, and they pointed out that much has changed in the decades since the law was enacted.

Others, including the leader of the Alabama Legislature's black caucus decried the ruling

In a 5-4 ruling, the court declared unconstitutional the provision of the landmark Voting Rights Act that determines which states and localities must get Washington's approval for proposed election changes.

The decision effectively puts an end to the advance approval requirement that has been used, mainly in the South, to open up polling places to minority voters in the nearly half century since it was first enacted in 1965, unless Congress can come up with a new formula that Chief Justice John Roberts said meets "current conditions" in the United States.

The chairman of the black caucus in the Alabama Legislature, Democratic Rep. Napoleon Bracy of Mobile, said he thought the ruling was "unfair and an injustice to African-Americans who have been through civil rights struggles."

"I think states that have a history of racial discrimination need to have federal oversight through the Department of Justice," Bracy said.

Ernest Montgomery, who is black and a lifelong resident of Shelby County, said he wouldn't have ever been elected to his seat on the Calera City Council without the voting rights act. He was disheartened by the court's decision.

"I'm very disappointed with it," Montgomery said in an interview at City Hall. "Disappointed isn't even the word for it."

Bentley said that the provision was necessary in the 1960s, but that there was no longer need for Alabama to get clearance from the federal government to change its voting procedures and rules.

"We have long lived up to what happened then, and we have made sure it's not going to happen again," he said.

He pointed out that the Alabama Legislature is 27 percent black — a similar proportion to the state's overall population — as a sign of the state's progress.

"I assure you that as long as I am governor we are not going to discriminate against anyone," Bentley said.

Shelby County attorney Butch Ellis said the high court's ruling will save local and state governments time and money without hurting the cause of voting equality. Ellis says local governments have spent more than $1 billion seeking Justice Department approval of voting changes. He says money spent on lawyers in the past can now go to schools, police and fire protections.

"I'm elated. It means that 12,000 cities, counties and states across the country that have been retained by this section under an outdated formula ... will no longer have to seek preclearance," said Ellis.

Attorney General Luther Strange said he was happy that the court recognized changes made in the South in the decades since the law was enacted.

"The Supreme Court today rightly recognized that Alabama and other covered jurisdictions could not be treated unequally based on things that happened decades ago," he said.

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors

Further Discussion

Here at PressHerald.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)