September 20, 2012

Before rat infestation, Porthole had 28 other violations

The waterfront restaurant closed for health violations in September was also cited in August, but never shut down.

By Randy Billings
Staff Writer

Less than a month before the Porthole was shut down for health code violations, the city's health inspector documented 28 violations at the waterfront restaurant but allowed it to stay open.

click image to enlarge

The Porthole Restaurant, the Comedy Connection, and Harbour's Edge, all on Custom House Wharf, were shut down Friday, September 14, 2012, by the Portland Health Inspector for what she cited as rat infestation, flies on food, drains going into the ocean and other violations.

Gabe Souza/Staff Photographer

Related headlines

Related Documents

Porthole Health Inspection from 2009
Porthole Complaint Follow Up 9-14-12

The city closed the Porthole and two associated businesses on Custom House Wharf -- the Comedy Connection nightclub and the Harbour's Edge banquet hall -- on Sept. 13, citing a long list of violations that included a "serious rat infestation."

All three businesses were allowed to reopen Sunday.

Documents released by the city Friday in response to a public records request by the Portland Press Herald showed that the Porthole had not been inspected since July 2008. But city spokeswoman Nicole Clegg later provided an inspection report from April 2009.

According to additional records released Tuesday, the city inspected the Porthole on Aug. 18 in response to a complaint. Officials said the Portland Fire Department requested the health inspection after a fire suppression system was activated inadvertently that evening. The restaurant closed after the incident.

The report from the inspection that followed includes three pages of violations, directing the restaurant to "remain closed until re-inspection" and to hire a pest control company. A note on the report says the building would be "shutting down Jan. 1 for (a) major overhaul."

City inspectors revisited the restaurant a day later and noted only six violations. A note on the report says, "no follow-up necessary due to impending closure."

Health Inspector Michele Sturgeon said she was called to the Porthole on Aug. 18 to ensure that any food that had been contaminated by the fire suppression chemicals was disposed of, but she decided to do a full inspection.

She did not inspect the Comedy Connection and Harbour's Edge, which share a kitchen with the Porthole.

Her report lists 28 violations, including eight critical violations, defined by state law as likely to pose a risk for contamination or illness, or an imminent health risk

Sturgeon said all but 13 violations, including two critical violations, were corrected while she was there, but the restaurant was required to have a follow-up inspection before reopening.

Restaurants with 13 or fewer violations -- no more than 10 non-critical and three critical -- are allowed to stay open, provided they work to fix the problems, Sturgeon said.

Oliver Keithly, who owns the Porthole, said his staff thoroughly cleaned the kitchen on Aug. 19. Workers removed equipment to clean up the fire suppression powder, and cleaned hood vents and other areas, he said.

Keithly said he also hired a pest control company. The property was assessed by Command Pest Services on Aug. 20, but the company said it would take a week or two get the equipment in to do the job, he said.

"What the city asked me to do is contact a pest management company and set up a contract, and that's what I did less than 24 hours after they asked me to do it," he said Wednesday.

An anonymous complaint was filed against the restaurant on Sept. 13, after several people allegedly got sick from eating potato salad at a function at the banquet hall. The inspection that day produced three pages of violations and a note from Sturgeon saying that no more violations would be itemized.

Keithly said he was "stunned" to have so many violations accumulate from Aug. 19 to Sept. 13.

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors

Further Discussion

Here at we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)