June 10, 2011

Bill Nemitz: Ballot-box fraud? GOP fixes problem that isn't there

It's called pulling a fast one, and the Maine Legislature just did it right before our eyes.


To read L.D. 1376, go to the Legislature's bill search page.

Wednesday evening, after a long, sometimes passionate debate, the Republican-controlled Senate fell into place behind the Republican-controlled House and, by an oh-so-close 18-17 vote, nixed a 38-year-old law allowing Mainers to register to vote on Election Day.

And why, pray tell, did they do that?

"I don't understand it. It's a head-scratcher to me," said Bangor City Clerk Patti Dubois, who is president of the Maine Association of Municipal Clerks, which opposed the move.

A quick recap:

Early on, Republicans who backed L.D. 1376, "An Act To Preserve the Integrity of the Voter Registration and Election Process," said it was all about voter fraud -- specifically, preventing politically motivated scoundrels from hopscotching all over Maine to vote multiple times in the same election.

Problem is, in the almost four decades since same-day registration was passed by another Republican-controlled Legislature, only one person has been caught casting two ballots. (Maine, it turns out, is a long way from, say, Chicago.)

Next, the GOP lined up behind Secretary of State Charlie Summers, who said he was all for the bill because it will alleviate a crushing burden reportedly faced each Election Day by municipal clerks and election workers from Kittery to Fort Kent.

Yes ... and no. While the clerks do have a problem with recent waves of last-minute absentee ballots -- in addition to cutting off new registrations at 5 p.m. on the Thursday before an election, the bill sets the same deadline for obtaining an absentee ballot -- not one clerk has publicly objected to allowing people to register on Election Day.

In fact, according to Dubois, the statewide clerks association supported L.D. 1367 "with the caveat that they take out the provision to take away same-day voter registration" and simply move up the absentee-ballot deadline.

"Same-day registration wasn't the issue for us," said Dubois. "Ultimately, we want to facilitate voting -- and it does that."

She's got that right. Over the past two general elections, about 68,000 Mainers have registered on the day they voted -- helping to propel Maine to third in the nation for voter turnout, behind Minnesota and Wisconsin (where same-day registration is also allowed).

Nevertheless, Summers, in an interview Thursday, stuck to his guns when asked why he advocated solving a same-day registration problem that, according to the clerks, doesn't exist.

"I think it does exist," insisted Summers.

Back at the State House, proponents of the bill were reduced by late Wednesday to simply saying, over and over, that eliminating same-day registration will "protect the integrity of the voting process."

Which brings us to Maine's Central Voter Registration system -- a database that since 2007 has served as an electoral clearinghouse for every municipal nook and cranny in Maine. Put simply, if you dare vote twice in the same election in this state, this system is going to catch you.

Don't believe me? Then take a look at what the secretary of state himself had to say back in January, when he boasted to the Legislature's Veterans and Legal Affairs Committee that the system had helped election officials "smoothly administer a very busy and closely watched election" in November.

"Our primary objective has been to seamlessly implement a reliable system that facilitates the voter registration process and assures the accuracy and integrity of Maine's elections," Summers told the lawmakers. "I am confident that we have met and exceeded that goal."

But that was then -- and this is now. Rep. Diane Russell, D-Portland, who serves on the Veterans and Legal Affairs Committee, is among those who say Summers and his allies in the Legislature can't have it both ways.

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors

Further Discussion

Here at PressHerald.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)