August 29, 2013

'Blitz' on to inspect oil-train contents

Regulators are checking for improper cargoes and testing flammability in the wake of the deadly Quebec crash.

By Kevin Miller
Staff Writer

WASHINGTON – Federal regulators have launched an inspection "blitz" of rail cars hauling crude oil from the Bakken oil fields, seven weeks after a train derailed and exploded in a town near the Maine-Quebec border, killing 47 people.

click image to enlarge

Petroleum transport rail cars sit on a siding near Route 115 in Yarmouth.

2013 Press Herald File Photo / Gordon Chibroski

Related headlines

The surprise inspections are intended to ensure that the contents of the tank cars match what is listed on the trains' paperwork. Inspectors also are collecting samples and testing the North Dakota crude -- which is "lighter" and thus more flammable than other unrefined oil -- to determine the "flash point" at which it will ignite, transportation officials said Thursday.

"Our big concern at the moment is that what is in the tank car is what people say is in the tank car," said Cynthia Quarterman, administrator of the U.S. Department of Transportation's Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration. "There are certain requirements that they have to meet if the flash point is different from what the regulations say."

The "Bakken blitz" began last weekend with surprise inspections along rail lines from the oil fields in North Dakota to refineries in the U.S. They had been planned since March, in response to audits that uncovered "inconsistencies" with the classification of crude oil in rail tankers, officials said.

The initiative gained urgency after the derailment July 6 in Lac-Megantic, Quebec, of an unmanned runaway train owned by a Maine railway. It was Canada's deadliest train accident in nearly 150 years and caused an estimated $200 million in damage.

Almost immediately, the intensity of the explosion and fire raised questions, given that crude oil is typically less volatile than other materials.

"That explosion in Lac-Megantic was very unusual for crude," said Joseph Szabo, head of the Federal Railroad Administration, which is doing the inspections with the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration. "Ethanol, you can see that happening. But generally speaking, most grades of crude would not be that volatile."

The disaster has increased scrutiny of the adequacy of rail safety regulations, amid a boom in shipments of crude oil.

On Thursday morning, Quarterman and Szabo spoke to a rail safety panel that is beginning a review of potential new requirements for trains that haul hazardous materials.

Among the proposals that the Railroad Safety Advisory Committee will discuss in the coming months are new restrictions on leaving trains loaded with hazardous materials unattended, and requiring at least two crew members on trains.

A single engineer was responsible for operating and securing the train that derailed in Quebec. The Montreal, Maine & Atlantic Railway, whose train crashed, has since filed for bankruptcy protection.

Szabo said 2012 was the safest year in railroad history in the U.S. "by virtually all measures." He noted that the number of train accidents has declined by 43 percent over the past decade.

"But when lives are lost, when families are broken, when a town is nearly wiped out, this is a reminder that our job, when it comes to safety, is never done," Szabo said.

The most contentious issue being discussed by the advisory committee -- composed of representatives from industry, labor unions and safety groups -- is whether trains with hazardous materials should be required to have at least two crew members.

Large railroads have historically negotiated minimum crew requirements as part of collective bargaining with the unions. The Montreal, Maine & Atlantic is among the few railroads in the U.S. and Canada that started using one-person crews to save money.

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors

Further Discussion

Here at we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)