March 2, 2013

What's a 'pimp'? Question at core of Zumba trial

Meanwhile, a Kennebunk police officer testifies Mark Strong is the man speaking to Alexis Wright in videos of her trading sex for money.

By Scott Dolan
Staff Writer

ALFRED — The lead investigator in the Kennebunk prostitution case testified Friday in the trial of Mark Strong Sr. that she considered him a "pimp."

click image to enlarge

Mark Strong Sr. is accused of helping Alexis Wright promote a one-woman prostitution business.

Tim Greenway / Staff Photographer

click image to enlarge

Kennebunk police Officer Audra Presby

Tim Greenway / Staff Photographer

Related headlines

Under questioning by one of Strong's attorneys, Kennebunk police Officer Audra Presby said a pimp is someone who makes money from prostitution. That drew three rapid-fire objections from the prosecutor.

Presby's testimony got to the heart of the prosecution's case against Strong, who is charged with conspiring with Alexis Wright to promote a sex-for-money business, and to the core of his defense.

When the trial started two weeks ago in York County Superior Court, Strong's attorney Daniel Lilley said in his opening statement that Strong had an extramarital affair with Wright but neither paid for sex nor profited from his relationship with her.

Under Maine law, however, the prosecution does not necessarily have to prove profit.

Presby was on the witness stand all day Friday and provided potentially important testimony in the high-profile case.

She testified that she linked Strong to the prostitution case after seeing him in a sex video with Wright, then matching his voice to recorded conversations with her.

And Presby revealed new information about Wright: The Zumba instructor was also a licensed investigator's assistant. Strong, an insurance businessman, was a licensed private investigator.

Presby testified Friday that, from a sex video recorded on Jan. 17, 2012, she matched Strong's voice to a man who was heard but not seen on dozens of other videos showing Wright exchanging sex for money with other men.

Strong allegedly watched the encounters live through a computer webcam and spoke with Wright through the computer when the men were out of the room.

They discussed things such as checking men's license plates and which clients she had lined up for the day.

"Each and every time I watched a video, I would hear a male voice," Presby said.

Friday was Presby's second day on the witness stand, after a brief appearance Thursday afternoon. She is expected to return to the stand Monday, along with several other Kennebunk police officers and possibly some of the men who have been convicted of engaging Wright for prostitution.

The most dramatic moment Friday came as Lilley questioned Presby about her use of the word "pimp" in one of her police reports and asked her to define the word.

"I felt that the word 'pimp,' at the time, was someone who was assisting, controlling her in the business of prostitution," Presby said.

"Your opinion is that a pimp in a prostitution deal would make money on the transaction?" Lilley asked.

"That is correct," Presby responded.

"So a pimp is someone who makes money, in your opinion?" Lilley asked.

"Objection," Deputy District Attorney Justina McGettigan called out with Lilley in mid-sentence.

"Objection!" she called out again as Lilley kept talking.

And again, raising her voice: "Objection!"

The judge in the trial, Justice Nancy Mills, made no ruling on the objections and called the attorneys to speak in whispers at the end of her bench, on the other end of the courtroom from the jury.

Presby testified Thursday that she was assigned to the investigation in September 2011, after the department had received complaints of suspicious activity at Wright's Pura Vida Zumba studio at 8 York St.

"I did not discover any suspicious activity," she said of her initial searches in 2011.

But she followed up on the Internet and found a blog that caught her attention, she said.

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors

Further Discussion

Here at we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)