November 7, 2013

Amanda Knox's defense gets boost

A new test shows no DNA from slain student on a kitchen knife.

The Associated Press

FLORENCE, Italy — U.S. student Amanda Knox’s defense got a boost on Wednesday when a new DNA test on a kitchen knife failed to conclusively prove that it was the murder weapon used to kill her British roommate.

click image to enlarge

Amanda Knox

click image to enlarge

Raffaele Sollecito, the Italian ex-boyfriend of Amanda Knox, awaits a hearing in an appeals court in Florence, Italy.

The Associated Press

An expert witness testified that the minuscule DNA trace on the knife handle near the blade showed ‘’considerable affinity” with Knox’s own DNA.

That confirmed what was already known from two previous trials: that Knox’s DNA was on the knife handle, identified through another trace.

No DNA belonging to the slain British student, Meredith Kercher, was identified. Previous genetic evidence on the blade linked to Kercher had been contested at earlier stages.

Outside the court, Knox defense lawyer Carlo Dalla Vedova told The Associated Press that the testimony confirms his contention that the knife was used by Knox solely for preparing food. “The report confirms that this is a kitchen knife. It is not a murder weapon,” Dalla Vedova said.

Luca Maori, a defense lawyer for Knox’s co-defendant Raffaele Sollecito, said the trace’s very existence also indicated the knife had not been washed. “It is something very important,” he said. “It is absurd to use it for a murder and put it back in the drawer.”

Prosecutors deferred comment for their summations, due later this month.

Knox and Sollecito were convicted in 2009 in the brutal slaying of Knox’s 21-year-old roommate in the apartment their shared in Perugia, and sentenced to 26 and 25 years in jail, respectively.

The conviction was overturned on appeal in 2011, freeing Knox after four years in jail to return to the United States, where she remains for the latest appeal.

Italy’s highest court ordered a fresh appeals trial, blasting the acquittal as full of contradictions and questioning failures to retest the tiny DNA trace in light of new advanced technology.

A spokesman for the Knox family in Seattle, David Marriott, was seeking comment from Knox on Wednesday’s testimony, but he said she was busy with classes at the University of Washington and doubted she would have anything to say.

The DNA evidence on the knife found by investigators in a kitchen drawer at Sollecito’s apartment has been among the most hotly contested pieces of evidence in the original trial and now in two appeals.

Prosecutors have contended the knife was the murder weapon because it matched Kercher’s wounds, and presented evidence in the first trial that it contained Kercher’s DNA on the blade and Knox’s on the handle.

But a court-ordered review during the first appeal in Perugia, where the murder happened, discredited the DNA evidence. It said there were glaring errors in evidence collecting and that below-standard testing and possible contamination raised doubts over the DNA traces linked to Kercher on the blade, as well as Sollecito’s DNA on Kercher’s bra clasp.

Sollecito, in an emotional 20-minute-long address to the court on Wednesday, said Knox was ‘’my first real love in my life, even if it was very late.”

He acknowledged he hadn’t taken seriously enough the accusations at the beginning because he was too caught up with his new romance with Knox to grasp the severity of the situation.

‘’Me and Amanda were living the dawn of a carefree romance, and we wanted to be completely isolated in our love nest,” Sollecito said. ‘’It was a little fairy tale.”

He said he has since been living a nightmare.

Prosecutors begin their summations later this month, followed by the defense in December.

A verdict is expected in January.

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors




Further Discussion

Here at PressHerald.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)