April 17, 2013

Newtown families disappointed by Senate vote

The Associated Press

HARTFORD, Conn. — Emotionally drained and weary family members of the Newtown shooting victims, thrust into a new role as gun control lobbyists, said they're disappointed but undaunted by the U.S. Senate's rejection Wednesday of an amendment expanding background checks for gun purchases.

click image to enlarge

While wearing green wrist bands honoring the victims of the Newtown school shooting, Senate Minority Leader John McKinney, R-Fairfield, who represents Newtown, Conn., looks at his notes prior to addressing the Senate floor at the Capitol in Hartford, Conn., Wednesday, April 3, 2013. Hundreds of gun rights advocates are gathering at the statehouse in Hartford ahead of a vote in the General Assembly on proposed gun-control legislation. (AP Photo/Charles Krupa)

click image to enlarge

This video image from Senate television shows the final vote total on gun control legislation that was defeated in the Senate Wednesday, April 17, 2013, at the Capitol in Washington. Senate Republicans backed by a small band of rural-state Democrats scuttled the most far-reaching gun control legislation in two decades, rejecting calls to tighten background checks on firearms buyers as they spurned the personal pleas of families of the victims of last winter's mass elementary school shooting in Newtown, Conn. (AP Photo/Senate Television)

Related headlines

Neil Heslin, whose 6-year-old son Jesse Lewis was among the 20 first graders and six educators killed at Sandy Hook Elementary School on Dec. 14, said he has spent the past two weeks in Washington, D.C. trying to persuade senators to pass the compromise legislation.

"It's discouraging what happened today, but it's just the beginning and I feel confident in the long run, and I know in the long run, changes will happen," Heslin said during a conference call with Connecticut U.S. Sens. Richard Blumenthal and Chris Murphy. "It's just a start and we're here to stay."

Carlee Soto's older sister Victoria Soto was a teacher slain at Sandy Hook. She described how the families' efforts to lobby the U.S. Senate have been "extremely exhausting" for everyone.

"We've been down here since Sunday night, talking to senators, talking to their staff members, telling our story," she said. "We don't get to grieve in private. We don't get to grieve with our families at home. We're here, grieving in public, trying to show the world that change needs to happen."

Appearing with President Barack Obama, Mark Barden, whose 7-year-old son Daniel was killed during the massacre, acknowledged that the expanded background checks proposal wouldn't have saved Daniel. However, he said the proposal has strong public support and would have ultimately saved lives.

"We return home for now, disappointed but not defeated. We return home with a determination that change will happen. Maybe not today, but soon," he said. "We will keep moving forward."

Many of the same family members had lobbied Connecticut lawmakers earlier this month to pass bipartisan legislation that includes sweeping gun control changes, including a ban on high capacity ammunition magazines and an expanded assault weapons ban.

State officials reacted Wednesday with shock, disappointment and anger to the U.S. Senate's rejection of a background check proposal some said paled in comparison to what Connecticut has enacted.

"Universal background checks? No? I don't get it. I don't get it," said House Minority Leader Lawrence Cafero Jr., a Republican from Norwalk. "And I say that with utmost respect. I just don't understand how you could vote no."

Both Democrats and Republicans in Connecticut had voiced support for federal legislation, often making the argument that whatever laws passed in Connecticut could prove ineffective without tougher federal laws on the books.

The background check measure commanded a majority of senators, 54-46, but that was well short of the 60 votes needed to advance. Forty-one Republicans and five Democrats sided to scuttle the plan.

Newtown First Selectman E. Patricia Llodra, a Republican, said she was disappointed by the Senate action on the background check proposal, calling it "heartbreaking" in an email to The Associated Press.

"Polls over the past weeks have consistently shown that 87 percent of Americans supported the proposed extension of background checks," she said. "The compromise bill would have provided some additional protections against the possibility of guns coming into the hands of persons who should not have access to weapons."

Llodra said she was proud of the Newtown families and organizations that have "worked tirelessly to maintain the country's focus on the need for gun-control change." She said their courage, dignity and integrity cannot be denied.

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors

Further Discussion

Here at PressHerald.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)