July 24, 2013

Swans claimed negative $110,518 income in 2006, IRS official testifies

A former Chelsea town manager also claims Carole Swan exerted pressure outside selectmen's meetings to ensure her husband, who ran Marshall Swan Construction, got a lot of the town's road work.

By Betty Adams badams@centralmaine.com
Staff Writer

BANGOR — Carole and Marshall Swan of Chelsea listed on their federal tax return a gross income of negative $110,518 for the 2006 tax year.

click image to enlarge

Carole Swan, left and defense attorney Caleigh Keevan are seen outside U.S. District Court in Bangor today, at the end of the second day of Swan's fraud trail.

Staff photo by Betty Adams

Related headlines

That includes a business loss of $38,000 and another loss — so far unspecified — of $79,600, in addition to $4,000 in earned wages and other gains and losses.

Testimony from Paul Crowley, a court witness coordinator from the Andover, Mass., office of the Internal Revenue Service, was halted at 2:30 p.m. Tuesday, and is expected to continue Wednesday morning in U.S. District Court in Bangor.

Also Tuesday, a former town official said Swan exerted pressure so he would award town work to Marshall Swan Construction, which was owned jointly by the couple.

Crowley was presenting the tax return in support of the government's charge that the Swans falsified their income tax returns for the tax years 2006–2010.

In opening arguments Monday, the prosecutor, Assistant U.S. Attorney Donald Clark said Marshall Swan Construction had $2.4 million in income during those years and paid almost no income tax because Carole Swan claimed huge losses for a harness horse racing business.

In court filings, Swan's attorney, Leonard Sharon said the business was her brother's, but the horses were bought in her name because of his bad credit. Sharon also said that Carole Swan was abused by her husband and feared him.

Carole Swan, 55, is on trial on income tax fraud charges as well as charges that she defrauded the federal workers' compensation system and a federal program funding repairs to Windsor Road while she was a town selectman.

Tuesday was the second day of her jury trial. Her husband faces similar charges of falsifying income tax returns and of aiding and abetting in the federal program fraud. He is to be tried at a later date.

Former Chelsea Town Manager Robert Drisko testified Tuesday that he believes then-Selectwoman Swan exerted pressure outside of selectmen's meetings to ensure her husband, who ran Marshall Swan Construction, got a lot of the town's road work.

Drisko, testifying in the second day of Swan's trial on multiple fraud charges, said, "She would work outside to get her own way. That's my own opinion."

Drisko spent more than an hour on the witness stand in U.S. District Court describing Chelsea's process for awarding road work.

Most of the dozen other witnesses talked for five minutes or less, testifying about work Swan's husband, Marshall Swan, did on their property and how they paid for it and whether they dealt with Carole or Marshall Swan. Most praised Marshall Swan's work, and several said they never saw or spoke to Carole Swan.

Cynthia E. Reynolds, of Vassalboro, testified that Marshall Swan did earthwork at her house in the spring of 2007 for $29,000, and she paid $10,000 with a bank check, and $19,000 in cash. There was no contract or paperwork, she said.

"Everybody recommended Marshall," she said, so she and her husband trusted him.

Drisko, who was town manager in Chelsea from 1997 until his retirement in 2004, said Marshall Swan, too, would ask him why he didn't get more town work.

"He was chewing me out," Drisko testified.

Drisko said that early in his tenure the road work that was under the minimum for contract bids was divided more evenly among town contractors, but later, Marshall Swan got more of it.

It's a wonder Marshall Swan had time.

Ten people testified Tuesday that they hired Marshall Swan Construction to do earth-moving as well as to install or repair septic systems, and most generally bought gravel from him. Most said they dealt only with Marshall Swan and had no contact with Carole Swan.

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors

Further Discussion

Here at PressHerald.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)