May 1, 2013

Wis. mom gets up to 10 years for baby's 1957 death

The Associated Press

SHEBOYGAN, Wis. — A Wisconsin woman accused of killing her baby more than 50 years ago showed up at her sentencing hearing Wednesday expecting to be sentenced to 45 days in jail as part of a plea agreement forged between lawyers. Instead, Ruby C. Klokow was sentenced to a maximum of 10 years in prison.

click image to enlarge

This undated file photo provided by the Sheboygan County, Wis., Sheriff shows Ruby Klokow. Klowkow, 76, convicted of killing her baby more than 50 years ago, was sentenced Wednesday, May 1, 2013, to prison for up to 10 years. (AP Photo/Sheboygan County Sheriff, File)

Klokow, 76, squeezed her eyes shut when a Sheboygan County judge told her that abiding by the plea agreement between prosecutors and her defense attorney would have been an affront to justice.

"What happened to Jeaneen Klokow was no accident. It was caused by the defendant's reckless actions," Judge Angela Sutkiewicz said.

Klokow had pleaded no contest in February to a charge of second-degree murder stemming from the 1957 death of her 6-month-old daughter. At the time, Jeaneen's death was ruled an accident but the case was reopened in 2008 after Klokow's son came forward with allegations of horrific child abuse.

Under questioning by investigators, Klokow acknowledged throwing Jeaneen roughly on the couch, causing her to bounce to the floor.

Klokow didn't speak at her sentencing hearing. An abused son pleaded for a lengthy sentence, while a number of Klokow's relatives tried to persuade the judge that Klokow already had been punished enough through decades of knowing what happened to her baby.

When the sentence was handed down an audible gasp filled the courtroom. Klokow, who had been occasionally dabbing her eyes and nose with a wadded-up tissue, closed her eyes and then blinked rapidly several times.

Defense attorney Kirk Obear told reporters afterward he was surprised by the sentence.

"If we could do it all over again, we'd have a trial and we'd win," Obear said.

He promised to initiate an appeal Thursday morning, in part on the basis of the sentencing process. He noted that the pre-sentencing report raised allegations that Klokow also physically and emotionally abused her other children decades ago, even though the statute of limitations on those abuse claims would have run out. He said those allegations shouldn't have been relevant for the purpose of sentencing.

Klokow likely will be granted parole when she becomes eligible in 2½ years, district attorney Joe DeCecco said

The case presented a number of quandaries for prosecutors. Klokow would have had to be tried for second-degree murder, a now-outdated charge, under the standards in play at the time of the 1957 crime. The obligations would include proving the defendant had a "depraved mind," a term so vague it was impossible to predict how jurors would interpret it in 2013.

DeCecco noted other reasons why the case would be difficult to prosecute. Key witnesses had died, memories had faded and jurors were likely to see Klokow as a sympathetic maternal or grandmotherly figure.

So he worked out a plea agreement calling for a lenient sentence, knowing the judge would probably overrule him with a much tougher punishment. He and Obear each recommended a sentence of 45 days in jail and 10 years of probation. But a judge is not bound by plea agreements, and Sutkiewicz did override this one.

"Anything but incarceration would diminish the seriousness of the offense," Sutkiewicz said.

Klokow, who sat in a pink turtleneck sweater and black slacks, wept when the sentence was handed down. Later, she stood at the clear plastic partition separating her from her supporters, their hands pressed against opposite sides of the window as if to touch one last time.

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors

Further Discussion

Here at we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)