May 8, 2011

Anti-drug enforcers brace for funding cuts

Federal trims will result in the loss of 14 percent of the state task force that aids both city and rural police forces.

By David Hench dhench@pressherald.com
Staff Writer

The Maine Drug Enforcement Agency stands to lose at least seven of its 49 drug agents -- 14 percent of the interagency task force -- in the coming year because of the loss of federal stimulus money, and it's only because of an increase in state money that the cuts aren't much deeper.

The cuts come at a time when urban police departments cite an increase in violent crime associated with drug addiction and rural agencies struggle with prescription drug diversion -- also a byproduct of addiction.

"There is not another issue in this state that affects communities and law enforcement as much as the drug issue," said South Portland Police Chief Ed Googins, president of the Maine Chiefs of Police Association. He noted that the MDEA conducted a search warrant at a suspected drug house in the middle of a residential South Portland neighborhood Thursday.

"To not have (MDEA) funded to the point where we can keep it in check is not good news," Googins said. "The fact of the matter is, for local law enforcement agencies, most departments in the state -- and South Portland is no different -- cannot adequately investigate the types of drug issues we're seeing."

Gov. Paul LePage's proposed budget would spend $747,000 more on the MDEA from the state's General Fund, which would soften the blow of federal cutbacks. Without the infusion of state cash, the drug agency would be laying off an additional 10 agents.

The state's General Fund contributed $2.4 million to the MDEA this year and is scheduled to increase that funding to $3.2 million next year and in fiscal year 2013.

As it is, five agent positions currently funded with money designed to stimulate the economy and avoid public-sector layoffs will be eliminated, said Roy McKinney, MDEA director.

Funding also will be cut for two other positions that were part of a special congressional appropriation to fight prescription drug abuse in northern Maine.

That may not be the end of the bad news for the state's effort to fight drug crime.

The federal Edward Byrne Memorial grants that help fund the MDEA agents and the prosecutors who litigate the cases have been steadily declining for the past several years and are slated to drop another 17 percent in the coming year.

The grant once funded the entire MDEA and was used to fund a wide array of anti-crime efforts in the state, from youth violence prevention to sex offender management.

But as the money shrank from $3 million in 2004 to $1.6 million this year, the MDEA and the prosecutors have become the priority, said Mary Lucia, senior planner with the state's Justice Assistance Council.

As it stands now, 31 agents are funded with federal grants and 18 are funded with state dollars.

The Justice Assistance Council plans a public hearing June 23 to gather input on how the federal money should be spent, she said.

Even if the cut does not lead to more drug agent layoffs, it is likely to cut grants for local departments, which typically use the money for new technology.

The MDEA was established to pool officers from different departments to investigate drug dealing in the state, a recognition that such illicit networks don't conform to municipal or county boundaries. Departments assign officers to MDEA and are then reimbursed by the agency so they can replace the lost manpower for strictly local policing.

"Maine is a vast state with a limited number of law enforcement resources," McKinney said. "Those communities for the most part cannot afford to assign an officer to a task force on a full-time and long-term basis. That's where the grant moneys were critical in being able to fund this process."

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors




Further Discussion

Here at PressHerald.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)