February 24, 2013

Court order: Walk while you whistle in Portland

After being charged with disorderly conduct, a man who loves to whistle while downtown agrees not to pursue his passion standing still.

By Randy Billings rbillings@pressherald.com
Staff Writer

(Continued from page 1)

click image to enlarge

Robert Smith is called The Whistler because of his almost daily habit of whistling loudly around downtown Portland.

Photos by Gabe Souza/Staff Photographer

click image to enlarge

Robert Smith whistles his way down Exchange Street in Portland recently. “I’m just trying to make people smile,” Smith says. But he disturbs some listeners, leading to legal troubles for Smith that he says won’t stop him from expressing himself.

Related headlines

Two months later, Smith was arrested and taken to jail after police received complaints about his whistling in front of Starbucks at Middle and Exchange streets. The charge again was disorderly conduct.

According to the July 3 arrest affidavit, Smith was whistling loud enough to disturb businesses and people in the area. After being warned to keep the noise down, Smith allegedly started singing louder, "intentionally to annoy bystanders."

Smith's May summons landed him in court. Court records indicate he pleaded guilty on Aug. 22, 2012, to the disorderly conduct charge and agreed "to curb disorderly behavior (loud whistling) in the future."

The plea agreement prohibits Smith from standing in one place and whistling. As long as he whistles while he walks, authorities agreed not to bother him.

His legal troubles are not enough to keep him from his passion.

Smith said he told police: "You can arrest me a thousand times, and the day I walk out of this jail, I'll be whistling out the door."

The reactions to his whistling have more to do with the listeners than the whistling itself, Smith said. While some smile, others confront him and threaten to beat him up, he said.

His whistling is such a shared experience among downtown regulars and office workers that he pops up in blog posts and online conversations.

"He acts like he's treating all of us to his amazing whistling show and that we should all be so lucky to hear him and his magical ability, but I don't feel lucky," wrote one blogger in a 2011 post to Thought Catalog. "I feel deep anger and hatred, because his whistling upsets my dog and every dog in the neighborhood."

People often speculate that Smith's whistling carries an ulterior motive. But despite being arrested four times in his life, there is no proof of such claims. He has been convicted of misdemeanors including theft, assault and harassment by telephone.

"I've heard that drug (dealing) thing. It doesn't faze me one bit," he said. "They just want an answer to what I do every day. They want to put an answer to something they have no answer to."


Smith said he unsuccessfully argued with police that the constitutional right to free speech protects his right to whistle.

"All I'm doing is expressing myself freely," he said recently. "People who express themselves freely should be held in the highest regard, not the lowest regard."

The American Civil Liberties Union of Maine declined to comment on Smith's specific case. However, the free-speech advocates said in a written statement that punishing someone for whistling does raise First Amendment concerns.

"In general, merely being annoying isn't enough to constitute disorderly conduct," said Maine ACLU spokeswoman Rachel Healy. "Unless it's meant to incite chaos or violence, whistling in public is usually not a crime -- and punishing someone for it could raise real First Amendment concerns."

McAllister, the city prosecutor, said she disagrees that whistling is a protected form of free speech.

A Portland city ordinance specifically mentions whistling as a disorderly behavior, which carries fines ranging from $100 to $500.

Since at least 1993, whistling has been included in the disorderly conduct ordinance, along with hooting and other unnecessary noises that "either annoy, disturb, or injure the health, peace or safety of others."

The code prohibits "the use of any loudspeaker or amplifier for the purpose of commercial advertising or attraction of the public to a specific building, location or business, yelling, shouting, hooting, whistling, or singing shall be considered to be loud, disturbing, and unnecessary noises."

According to McAllister, Smith's whistling fit the bill.

(Continued on page 3)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors

Further Discussion

Here at PressHerald.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)