Friday, May 24, 2013
By Bill Nemitz bnemitz@mainetoday.com
Columnist
They call it the straight-face test. And Tuesday afternoon, just in the nick of time, the powers that be at Portland City Hall passed it.
"I can't believe it! I'm just so happy right now!" said Christina Shaw upon hearing that her day in court against the city's Health and Human Services Department – over her failure to report a whopping 28 cents in income – won't be necessary after all.
That's right. Until the city finally called off its attorneys, a struggling family's entire future hinged on a quarter and three pennies.
Here's what happened.
Late in January, Shaw bundled up two of her kids – Max, 2, and Mariah, 1 – and headed out from their apartment on Auburn Street to do the grocery shopping at Portland's Northgate Plaza.
In this 26-year-old mother's world, that is not as simple as it sounds.
Shaw, you see, has no income – she dropped out of Bonny Eagle High School in Standish when she was 13 after years of special education. To this day, she said, she reads and writes at only the third-grade level.
Her life over the past year has been a work in progress – the state took custody of her three kids last summer while Shaw and her kids were living in the city's family shelter.
Shaw's son Damon, 5, remains with his grandparents. But since Shaw managed to get the younger two back late last year, she has worked full time – as in parenting classes, counseling sessions and whatever other hoops the Maine Department of Health and Human Services insists she jump through – to keep her young family from splitting permanently at the seams.
Tim Hoffman, Shaw's live-in boyfriend and the father of Max and Mariah, also has no job. According to Shaw, Hoffman sustained serious injuries a few years back when he fell two stories while working for a roofing contractor.
Thus, the family relies on Portland's General Assistance program to cover the $850 monthly rent on their apartment, as well as every-other-week vouchers worth $85.35 for food and $10.50 for non-food items. (They also receive $350 in monthly food stamps and get their health needs met through MaineCare.)
In short, these people don't just rely on the social safety net – they're immersed in it. And while that might make your blood boil in these fiscally challenged times, let's not forget the two young children who asked for none of this.
So there Shaw stood in the grocery-store checkout line that day, caught between Mariah with a full diaper, Max with a cranky hankering for candy they couldn't afford and a store clerk who told Shaw, over and over, that the non-food items she'd piled on the counter exceeded the $10.50 voucher.
Shaw frantically mixed and matched. She left in the toilet paper, but took out the ... window cleaner? And still, while the line of increasingly exasperated customers looked on, the total hovered stubbornly at $10.78.
That's when a friend named Dave, who'd responded to Shaw's plea for a ride home, stepped in.
While Shaw changed Mariah on a nearby bench, Dave handed the clerk a $20 bill to cover the 28-cent deficit. The clerk rang up the sale and handed Dave his $19.72 in change.
Fast forward to last month, when Shaw stopped by the city's welfare office to receive her monthly General Assistance vouchers.
"It was like, 'Boom! You're denied,'" she recalled.
Why?
For that, let's go to the decision issued last week by Stephen Bither, the city fair hearing officer who heard – and turned down – Shaw's and Hoffman's appeal.
(Continued on page 2)
Tweet
Further Discussion
Here at PressHerald.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include: