By RICARDO ALONSO-ZALDIVAR The Associated Press
WASHINGTON - It took lawmakers a year to shape President Obama's health care bill. If it finally passes Congress, it'll take the better part of a decade to write the user manual for consumers and doctors, employers and insurance companies.

House Budget Committee members Rep. Connie Mack, R-Fla., left, and Rep. John Campbell, R-Calif., examine the health care legislation as the committee begins suggesting changes and making revisions to the Senate bill Monday. The House is expected to vote on the final legislation this week, with the Senate to follow later.
The Associated Press
Some health insurance consumer protections would go into place immediately, significant but limited in scope. The big expansion in coverage comes in four years. About 25 million people would sign up, with most getting tax credits to help pay premiums. Ripple effects continue well after Obama has to leave office in 2017, if he's re-elected.
But even if the 2,700-plus-page bill passes, it's only the end of the beginning. The Obama blueprint will be carried out under less-than-ideal circumstances. Rising medical costs and an aging population will keep squeezing the federal budget. Lawmakers will have to revisit hard choices they sidestepped.
"This is going to play out over a generation," said Andrew Hyman, who oversees health insurance research for the nonpartisan Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. "It will address how people get coverage, how health care is delivered, and how health care is paid for."
The House is expected to vote on the final legislation this week, with the Senate to follow later. Here's a primer on some of the major effects for consumers and other key players:
IMMEDIATE CHANGES
Uninsured people with medical problems would have a workable alternative. The bill would pump $5 billion into high-risk insurance pools run by the states to provide coverage to those in frail health. Taxpayer-backed insurance wouldn't be free, but premiums should be much lower than what's charged by private insurers willing to take those in poor health.
For people with private health insurance -- about two-thirds of Americans -- there would be some new safeguards. For example, insurers would be barred from placing lifetime dollar limits on coverage and from canceling policies except in cases of fraud. Children could stay on their parents' coverage until age 26.
THE SELF-EMPLOYED
Starting in 2014, self-employed people and those whose employers don't offer coverage would be able to pick a plan through a health insurance exchange, like a supermarket. It's modeled on the federal employee health program available to members of Congress, with a range of private plans. Small businesses could also join.
About 25 million people would buy coverage through state exchanges, and nearly 6 in 10 would be eligible for help with their premiums. The new tax credits would be computed according to income and other household characteristics. The money would go straight to the insurer. To consumers it would look like a discount -- generous for lower-income families, less so for those solidly in the middle class.
For example, a family of four making $44,000 would pay $2,763 in premiums -- about 6 percent of its income -- for a policy worth $9,435.
But a similar family making $66,000 would have to pay $6,257 in premiums, close to 10 percent of its income. That may be less than a mortgage, but it's more than a car payment.
Once the exchanges open, most Americans would be required to carry health insurance or pay a fine. Medicaid would be expanded to cover childless adults living near poverty, bringing the total who would gain coverage to more than 30 million.
People with employer-provided insurance would not see major changes. But if they lost their job, they'd be able to get coverage through the exchange.
SENIORS
Seniors have been understandably worried about the health care plan, much of it financed with Medicare cuts that the government's own experts say could be unsustainable.
In the crosshairs are subsidies to private Medicare Advantage insurance plans, which now enroll about one-quarter of seniors. The government overpays the plans when compared with the cost of care under traditional Medicare. That largesse translates to lower costs for seniors in the plans, and the overhaul could trigger an exodus from Medicare Advantage as insurers are forced to raise rates to stay in business.
But seniors stand to gain as well. Obama would gradually close the coverage gap in the middle of the Medicare prescription drug benefit. The so-called doughnut hole would start to shrink immediately, but it wouldn't be fully closed until 2020. In the meantime, seniors in the gap would get a 50 percent discount on brand-name drugs.
The plan also would improve preventive benefits for seniors in traditional Medicare.
DOCTORS
Primary care doctors and general surgeons practicing in underserved areas such as inner cities and rural communities would get a 10 percent bonus from Medicare. But the more significant changes for doctors would unfold slowly. The goal is to start rewarding doctors for keeping patients healthy, not just treating them when they get sick.
The plan would use Medicare as a testing ground for new ways of coordinating care for patients with multiple chronic illnesses such as high blood pressure, diabetes and heart problems, a common combination. Primary care doctors would become care managers for patients, keeping close tabs on medications and basic health indicators.
Doctors and hospitals would be encouraged to band together in "accountable care organizations" modeled on the Mayo Clinic.
EMPLOYERS
Obama's plan wouldn't require employers to provide insurance to their workers, but it would hit them with a stiff fine if even one of their workers gets a federally subsidized coverage. Companies with 50 or fewer workers would be exempt, and those with 25 workers or fewer could get federal assistance.
But the fines could turn into a big headache for many employers, particularly since they may not be able to tell if their workers are getting benefits from the government. For example, a company with 100 employees that fails to provide coverage could face a fine of $140,000 under the plan that Obama unveiled Feb. 22. Getting the bill from the IRS would become a dreaded moment for business owners.
INSURANCE COMPANIES
Health insurance companies would face unprecedented federal regulation and particularly close scrutiny of their bottom line. A fixed percentage of income from premiums would have to go to medical care; otherwise, insurers would be forced to provide rebates to consumers. That share is 85 percent for large group plans, and 80 percent for plans in the small group and individual markets.
One of the central reforms of the bill won't start until 2014, when the exchanges open. From then on, insurers will not be able to turn away people with medical problems or charge them more.
Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form
4 COMMENTS
Hadenough said...
Interesting! No comments from the "ram socialism down our throats" Fox news talking points brigade. This article clearly lays out the truth and widespread benefits of the presidents health care bill. Lets roll
March 16, 2010 at 8:58 AM Report abuse
BSmart said...
The Truth???? Are the American people REALLY this stupid? This article, like all the other pro-Obama puff pieces about health totally ignores the most important reality. I see that we'll the government will be subsidizing tens of millions of new insurance policies, I see that we'll be setting up a "pool" for high risk patients and I see loads and load of SPENDING. Ten TRILLION in fact, according to the non-partisan budget office. I see huge new taxes not only on the middle class but also on medical device makers and other medical suppliers. Guess what I DON'T SEE?? A single NICKLE of cost savings. OK, not a PENNY of cost savings. How will we, as a nation PAY for this useless monstrosity?? HOW??
March 16, 2010 at 9:23 AM Report abuse
Hadenough said...
Bsmart. If you're really willing to know the answer to your questions you'll have to remove the blinders. The answer is right there. Look for it. Your blood pressure will settle, your question will be answered, then maybe you'll Bsmart.
March 16, 2010 at 9:35 AM Report abuse
xcalibur1066 said...
There is only one reason for these reforms : drive up the cost of health insurance premiums to the point that there is a public outcry and demand a single payer system. One truth left out - private insurance premiums will rise as soon as the pre-existing condition clause goes into effect. There is no other way around it.
March 16, 2010 at 10:51 AM Report abuse