Wednesday, June 19, 2013
By Tux Turkel tturkel@mainetoday.com
Staff Writer
The Norwegian company that wants to build a demonstration floating wind farm off the coast near Boothbay Harbor will hold three public meetings this month to update its progress and answer questions.

Norwegian company Statoil is considering a test plan for four floating wind turbines off Boothbay Harbor. They’d look similar to this Hywind test turbine, now producing power off Norway.
Trude Refsahl / Statoil
PUBLIC MEETING DETAILS
The Norwegian energy company Statoil will update the public at three meetings this month on its plans to build floating wind turbines about 12 miles off the coast of Boothbay Harbor.
JUNE 25, Boothbay Firehouse, 4-7 p.m.
JUNE 26, Rockland Public Library, 5:30-8 p.m.
JUNE 27, Gulf of Maine Research Institute, Portland, 4-7 p.m.
Representatives from Statoil will be in Boothbay on June 25, in Rockland on June 26 and in Portland on June 27.
Statoil has been testing a floating offshore wind turbine in Norway since 2009, and says it's encouraged by the performance of the project, called Hywind.
International energy companies such as Statoil are in a race to design wind turbines that float in deep water, rather than being anchored to the seabed. Offshore sites have stronger, more consistent wind. The challenge is to design cost-effective equipment that can withstand extreme weather and sea conditions.
Last year, Statoil filed with the U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management for a commercial lease to test a four-turbine project off Maine, starting in 2016. The public meetings are meant to explain how the company is progressing with environmental studies and other tasks it will need for permits, if it decides to move ahead.
If Statoil does go forward, the Hywind Maine prototype will become the first floating, deep-water wind farm in the United States and could pave the way for a large-scale project. It also would advance Maine's ambition to be a leader in offshore wind-energy research, and position businesses to provide goods and services for what could become a growing industry.
"The purpose (of the meetings) is to be open about our plans," said Ola Morten Aanestad, vice president of communications for Statoil North America. "It's in a very early phase yet. There's no decision to go ahead, from our side."
Statoil says it will make a decision in 2014. That's a while away, but the fact that Statoil is taking the time to hold public meetings indicates that the company is serious about Maine, Aanestad said.
Several challenges must be overcome before turbines are spinning at the test site, 12 miles off Boothbay Harbor.
Consultants working for Statoil first must finish in-the-water studies by year's end, on issues such as the rotating blades' impact on migrating birds and bats. It ultimately will need a timely commercial lease and various state and federal permits.
Some of the issues the company faces were previewed in the winter, when a task force formed by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management held a public meeting in South Portland. The issues include the impact on fishing grounds and gear, shipping lanes and recreational boating. People concerned about those and other matters are expected to attend the upcoming meetings.
The test site is less than four square miles. It's in federal waters that are more than 400 feet deep on the Outer Continental Shelf. Good wind speeds have been measured in the area, which is well beyond the view of most coastal residents.
Hywind Maine would have the capacity to generate 12 megawatts, which would meet the power needs of roughly 18,000 homes. But it's too early to say how the project would be connected by undersea cable, where the power would be sold, and how much it would cost. The terms of a power purchase agreement for demonstration projects have yet to be announced by the Maine Public Utilities Commission.
Habib Dagher, the University of Maine professor who has led the state's offshore wind-power effort, noted that a study last year showed the cost of electricity from a pilot project could be three times current rates, up to 30 cents per kilowatt hour. By law, the impact on ratepayers would be minimal because of the tiny output of the project.
(Continued on page 2)
Tweet
Further Discussion
Here at PressHerald.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include: