February 10, 2013

Washington Notebook: King, Collins earn praise for roles on committee

By Kevin Miller kmiller@pressherald.com
Staff Writer

WASHINGTON - The public got a glimpse at the normally secretive Senate Intelligence Committee on Thursday and, for Mainers, some insights into the role that two of their own may play on the panel.

click image to enlarge

Independent Sen. Angus King and Republican Sen. Susan Collins

2012 file photo/The Associated Press

Sens. Susan Collins and Angus King occupy two of the 15 seats on the Senate Intelligence Committee, one of two panels that oversee the nation's top secret intelligence-gathering activities. They are sought-after posts due to the critical national security issues the committees handle, even if membership doesn't necessarily lend itself to the type of tangible benefits to constituents as would serving on, say, a committee that controls the federal purse strings. (Collins is on Senate Appropriations).

King, an independent serving his first term, received national press for his questions to CIA director nominee John Brennan about the White House's use of unmanned drone aircraft to kill U.S. citizens working abroad with terrorist groups.

King and others would like to see a court-like panel outside of the executive branch that would review such "targeted strikes."

Collins, meanwhile, asked Brennan about possible international backlash to excessive drone strikes, the CIA's increasing role as a paramilitary force and why it took the White House so long to share with senators classified legal documents on the use of drones against U.S. citizens.

The lines of questioning earned both King and Collins some praise from organizations concerned about the clandestine drone program, which the White House rarely discusses.

Christopher Anders, senior legislative counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union, praised Collins for her outspokenness on getting the Obama administration to release its legal justification on the drone strikes.

"I think that's been a very important role that she has played as a Republican member of the committee," Anders said.

KING AND THE TEA PARTY?

Maine's Constitution-citing tea party members and libertarians may have more in common with King than they thought.

During Thursday's hearing, King twice turned to his iPhone for guidance. He was apparently using an app that contains a copy of the U.S. Constitution and other guiding documents of government.

A history buff who teaches at Bowdoin College, King said he referred to the Constitution for his questions about the rights to due process under the Fifth Amendment and ensuring that the executive branch's powers are kept in check when it comes to drone attacks on U.S. citizens.

"It's not a dry document," King said in an interview. "One of the principles of the Constitution is that powers should be dispersed and should not be concentrated in one branch" of government.

MAINE AND SLAVERY

And while we're on the Constitution ...

After a Connecticut representative publicly complained about the incorrect portrayal of his state's votes on the 13th Amendment in the film "Lincoln," I went back and looked up where Maine's delegation stood on the 1864 and 1865 votes to end slavery.

Maine Rep. Lorenzo De Medici Sweat of Portland was the only New Englander to oppose what would become the 13th Amendment. All of Maine's other House and Senate members -- Reps. James Blaine, Sidney Perham, John H. Rice and Frederick Pike and Sens. William Fessenden and Lot Morrill -- voted for the constitutional amendment ending slavery.

Sweat's vote may have had plenty to do with his party politics. He was a Democrat while all of Maine's other representatives in Washington were members of Lincoln's Republican Party.

Many Portland residents and other Mainers have likely been to Sweat's home without knowing it. Sweat's wife, writer and member of the "artistic elite" Margaret Jane Mussey Sweat, deeded what is known as the McLellan House or the McLellan-Sweat Mansion to the Portland Society of Art upon her death in 1908.

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors




Further Discussion

Here at PressHerald.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)