January 3, 2013

LePage readies bills to tighten welfare rules

Among the measures is a bill that could ban drug felons from welfare and prohibit food stamps to buy soda.

By Steve Mistler smistler@pressherald.com
Staff Writer

The LePage administration appears ready to challenge the new Democratic-controlled Legislature with several bills to reform Maine's welfare system.

Paul LePage
click image to enlarge

Gov. Paul LePage is expected to continue efforts to tighten welfare eligibility this year, and his administration has prepared several bills with that intent.

The Associated Press

The administration has submitted a bill that could ban convicted drug felons from receiving public assistance. Another proposal could allow the Department of Health and Human Services to prohibit the use of food stamps to buy soda.

A third proposal, which may be aimed at welfare fraud, could grant additional subpoena powers to the commissioner of the DHHS.

The exact language of the bills is not yet available, and officials in the DHHS did not respond to requests for comment. However, the titles of the bills have been submitted on behalf of the administration, according to legislative documents.

The new bills are consistent with the governor's previous efforts to tighten welfare eligibility. In 2011, LePage proposed, and the Legislature passed, a two-year budget that capped eligibility for a core welfare program -- Temporary Assistance for Needy Families -- at five years.

Also in the budget was a provision that required convicted drug felons to pass drug tests before receiving welfare benefits.

One of the new bills, L.R. 525, "An Act to Make Convicted Drug Felons Ineligible for TANF Assistance," appears to take the 2011 budget provision a step further. It promises to reignite a debate that Maine and other states have had.

In 1996, Congress passed the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act, which barred convicted drug felons from receiving welfare. The federal law allowed states to modify or eliminate the ban, and 32 states have either lifted it or changed it, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

Maine removed the ban in 2002, after advocates for low-income people said it withheld assistance from children whose mothers were convicted.

They also argued that barring drug felons from public assistance could lead them to commit more crimes, out of desperation.

Those arguments recently prompted lawmakers in Missouri, West Virginia and Delaware to propose lifting the ban. But supporters of the prohibition argue that allowing drug felons to receive assistance rewards illegal behavior.

LePage has said repeatedly that Maine is too generous with its public assistance so it is limiting resources to help the truly needy.

He has supported drug testing for all welfare recipients, although that proposal lost traction because of concerns about costly legal challenges experienced in Florida.

Another bill submitted by the administration may resurrect a debate over whether food stamps should be used to buy soft drinks. Several states, including Maine, have reviewed similar proposals in recent years.

L.R. 528 would direct the DHHS to seek a waiver from the federal government to ban the use of food stamps to buy soft drinks.

Similar bills have been proposed in other states, where lawmakers have tried to put soda, candy bars and other junk foods on the short list of items that can't be bought with Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program cards.

The federal program now prohibits the purchase of alcohol, tobacco and other non-food products. Banning food products requires a federal waiver.

In 2009, Democratic state Rep. Peggy Pendleton of Scarborough introduced a bill seeking a ban on soda.

While some health advocates supported it, the proposal died before reaching a floor vote. The Legislature's Health and Human Services Committee unanimously rejected the bill.

Opponents of the idea say it unfairly targets low-income people, while proponents argue that soda feeds an obesity epidemic. Earlier this year, the California watchdog group Eat Drink Politics argued that taxpayers should not be subsidizing American obesity with food stamps.

In 2011, New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg made a similar argument when he pitched a two-year pilot program to determine whether it would reduce obesity rates among food stamp users.

The federal government rejected the proposal, saying it would be too difficult to implement.

A third proposal by the LePage administration would grant additional subpoena power to the DHHS commissioner and his or her "designee."

According to the Maine Health Information Management Association, the DHHS can now subpoena records in enforcement matters related to child or elder abuse.

Other states have expanded the powers of health and human services officials to include subpoenas in the investigation of welfare fraud.

LePage has frequently vowed to crack down on welfare fraud and has tried to beef up DHHS investigating teams.

Staff Writer Steve Mistler can be contacted at 791-6345 or at:

smistler@pressherald.com

twitter/stevemistler

 

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors




Further Discussion

Here at PressHerald.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)