September 17, 2013

LePage: Study backs no broader Medicaid

However, two health care experts say the same study makes the case for expanding the program.

By Joe Lawlor
Staff Writer

AUGUSTA – Gov. Paul LePage on Monday touted a recent University of Michigan study as bolstering his stand against expanding Medicaid in Maine.

Two health care experts, on the other hand, said the same study actually does the opposite and makes the case for broadening the health insurance program for low-income residents.

"Overall, the study reached different conclusions than the (LePage) press release highlighted," said Mitchell Stein, public policy director for the Maine advocacy group Consumers for Affordable Health Care.

Erika Ziller, a senior research associate at the University of Southern Maine, concluded that the study instead supports expansion efforts.

LePage this year joined other Republican governors in resisting Medicaid expansion, a key component of President Obama's Affordable Care Act. He vetoed an expansion of MaineCare -- as Medicaid is called in Maine -- this spring, effectively denying coverage to more than 70,000 uninsured Maine residents, although the issue will likely come up again when the Legislature reconvenes in January.

LePage, in a news release Monday, pointed out that younger men, smokers and those more likely to drink alcohol would benefit from Medicaid expansion, according to a study by University of Michigan researchers published in the October edition of the Annals of Family Medicine.

"This study illustrates why we oppose a very costly Medicaid expansion," LePage wrote of the study. "This expansion of welfare would provide services to a younger population, while depleting scarce resources that are critical to care for those who desperately need assistance. We must ensure our neediest Mainers, the elderly and disabled, are put at the front of the line."

But under the Affordable Care Act, Medicaid expansion dollars would not be directed toward seniors, so LePage gives an apples-to-oranges comparison, Ziller said. "A 35-year-old carpenter is not going to be taking the place of an elderly person at an assisted living facility," she said.

While new Medicaid enrollees under the federal expansion rules would be more likely to drink and smoke, the study also says that the expanded Medicaid population would include people who are less likely to be obese or have depression. Taken as a whole, the new enrollees would be healthier than current Medicaid recipients, according to the study.

"Overall, potentially eligible adults report significantly better health status than current beneficiaries," the study says.

With a healthier pool of people insured, the per-person costs of Medicaid should go down under expansion, according to Stein. And, he said, if the smokers and drinkers had access to health care, they would likely improve their health, which would also drive down health care costs.

"This would get them access into smoking cessation programs and into substance abuse programs where they could control their problems," Stein said.

The federal government would have reimbursed Maine 100 percent of the costs of the expansion for the first three years, and 90 percent in subsequent years. LePage pointed to increasing costs in future years as a reason to oppose Medicaid expansion.

According to LePage's news release Monday, "The (U.S.) Congressional Budget Office projects that 13 million people will become newly eligible for Medicaid in the states that choose to expand by 2022. The nonprofit Kaiser Family Foundation calculates this would cost states $8 billion more between now and 2022."

But the Kaiser Family Foundation website goes on to point out that while states would be paying $8 billion more for Medicaid through 2022, those states would also see their costs for uncompensated care -- which includes low-income residents being treated at emergency rooms -- go down.

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors

Further Discussion

Here at we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)