August 29, 2013

Rail fears: Fatigue, crew size, retrofitting

In the wake of the deadly Quebec derailment, a federal panel hears concerns on railroad safety.

By Kevin Miller
Staff Writer

WASHINGTON – A federal panel heard comments Wednesday on the adequacy of safety regulations for railroads, during the first of two meetings that will focus on last month's deadly train derailment in Lac-Megantic, Quebec.

A Pan Am Railways freight train moves through the Riverton neighborhood of Portland, bearing a red placard that indicates it is carrying crude oil. A federal hearing Wednesday was intended to give interest groups and the public a chance to comment generally on the transportation of hazardous materials via rail.

2013 Press Herald file

Related headlines

Fatigue is the top safety concern among train crew members, said a representative of one of the major unions for railroad workers.

James Stem, national legislative director with the Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation union, also questioned whether a one-person crew -- like the one responsible for securing the Montreal, Maine & Atlantic train that destroyed part of Lac-Megantic, killing 47 people -- can do all of the duties required to safely operate trains that haul hazardous materials.

"One person cannot be sitting on a locomotive monitoring the brake equipment while they make a visual inspection of the train," Stem told representatives from the Federal Railroad Administration and the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration. "One person cannot properly secure a train to be left unattended. So single-person operation is also a major issue."

Wednesday's meeting and a session Tuesday were scheduled before the disaster July 6 in Lac-Megantic. Both were intended to give interest groups and the public a chance to comment generally on rail transportation of hazardous materials. The derailment and explosion added urgency to the discussion.

On Thursday, more than 50 members of the Federal Railroad Administration's Railroad Safety Advisory Committee will convene in Washington to discuss the accident in Lac-Megantic, several safety directives issued after the derailment, and the potential need for more regulatory changes.

Railroads have already started making changes ordered by the Federal Railroad Administration on Aug. 2, said Sarah Yurasko, regulatory counsel for the Association of American Railroads, which represents most major rail companies. Railroads also have voluntarily adopted tougher safety standards for carrying crude oil.

"Today, crude and ethanol along with other flammable and combustible liquids now receive the industry's recommended special-handling procedures already in use for the safe movement of certain hazardous materials," Yurasko said.

But Karen Darch, mayor of the Village of Barrington in Illinois, strongly criticized the rail industry and federal regulators for failing to retrofit tens of thousands of rail tanker cars that have raised safety concerns for more than two decades.

DOT-111 tanker cars were involved in the crash in Lac-Megantic and in a derailment in Rockford, Ill., in 2009 that killed one person.

Beginning in October 2011, new DOT-111 tank cars were built to specifications believed to help prevent ruptures and leaks during accidents. But the rail and chemical industries have resisted efforts to require retrofits of the tens of thousands of older DOT-111 cars in use.

Darch, who is also president of a rail safety advocacy group called the TRAC Coalition, said that opposition shows "a willful and wanton disregard" for the communities that may face incidents during the 30-year lifespan of those existing cars.

"Such a position shows a callous and indefensible disregard for public safety, especially when you have had two-plus decades to fix the problem," Darch said. "While there will likely be many causal factors involved in the Lac-Megantic derailment, tank cars with a propensity to rupture are quite literally at the heart of the tragedy."

A representative for Dow Chemical, the largest bulk shipper of chemicals in the U.S., said her company supports continued improvements to tank cars within a "holistic risk management framework" that also focuses on improving operating standards, rail infrastructure and responses to prevent accidents.

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors

Further Discussion

Here at we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)