November 30, 2013

Personal care aides give much, earn little

Compassion drives members of this growing segment of the workforce to work for low – and sometimes no – compensation.

By Tom Moroney
Bloomberg News

BRIDPORT, Vt. — The yellow squash has an ugly rotten spot. “Mommy’s little secret,” Amanda Sheppard says as she surveys mounds of produce at the local food pantry. She’ll take the hand-out, knife away the rot and her family will never know.

click image to enlarge

Amanda Sheppard holds hands with a client to provide reassurance.

click image to enlarge

Amanda Sheppard, right. helps Anette Adams organize her pills at Adams’ home in New Haven, Vt.

Bloomberg News photos

Sheppard’s survival tricks are finely-tuned after seven years as a personal care aide, the fastest growing job in America. Selecting a box of Cheerios, she spies a six-pound can of tomatoes; she’ll divvy it into glass jars and it’ll last weeks. Between what she’s picked up today, free school lunches for her 8-year-old and suppers at the Congregational Church off the common in Middlebury, Vt., her family won’t go hungry.

Supermarket shopping can be a luxury because of what she does for a living, making $9.78 an hour, with no benefits or guaranteed hours. She’s one of more than 900,000 personal care aides, caregivers who provide comfort and companionship for the elderly and disabled and perform daily chores so they can remain in their homes. It’s a signature occupation of a post-recession economy creating mostly low-wage jobs.

The number of PCAs, as they’re called, will increase 70 percent between 2010 and 2020, making it the fastest-growing job in the country, according to the Department of Labor. The trade is exploding as the country ages and Medicaid focuses on keeping people out of nursing homes and other facilities. That saves money, and requires an army of caregivers like Sheppard who are helping fill the growing ranks of the working poor.

WORKING FOR FREE

Five-feet-four with blond hair, Sheppard, 31, is a combination groomer, cook, housekeeper, guardian and friend. Her schedule is typical for a PCA: spotty and unpredictable. She has one full-fledged client, and two who can’t pay her at the moment. She tends to them anyway. It’s a generosity Kent State University sociologist Clare Stacey found was common among the home-care workers she studied for her 2011 book, “The Caring Self.” They spend extra hours with their charges knowing they won’t be reimbursed because, as Sheppard says, “What am I supposed to do, just leave them?”

As an independent contractor, not on the payroll of a home- care company, Sheppard isn’t in the Bureau of Labor Statistics tally. While the government counted 985,230 PCAs in 2012 – a 44 percent increase from 2010 – there were an additional 800,000 like Sheppard who weren’t included in the category, “and that’s a very conservative estimate,” says Abby Marquand, an associate director at the New York-based Paraprofessional Healthcare Institute, an advocacy group for direct-care workers, 90 percent of whom are women.

The average hourly pay for the PCAs the government tracked in 2012 was $10.01, according to the BLS. Adjusted for inflation, their wages fell 5 percent over a decade. Sheppard has earned the same state-set rate since she started in 2006, and inflation means her real wage has dropped 14 percent. Vermont will give some PCAs a raise this month to $11 an hour.

LOWER-WAGE CATEGORY

That’s in the lower-wage category of most of the jobs produced in the labor market recovery after the 2007-2009 recession, according to a study by the National Employment Law Project in New York, which receives funding from foundations and unions. The study found 58 percent of those created between 2010 and 2012 paid $13.83 an hour or less.

Two years after the recession was over, 32 percent of working families didn’t earn enough to cover basic necessities, up from 28 percent in 2007, according to a report by the nonprofit Working Poor Families Project that analyzed 2011 U.S. Census data. In the home-care sector, workers make so little that 50 percent depend on some form of government assistance, according to Dorie Seavey, PHI’s policy research director.

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors




Further Discussion

Here at PressHerald.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)