December 12, 2013

Senate Republicans likely to stall nominations

They may be paying back Democrats for paring the number of votes required to end filibusters.

The Associated Press

WASHINGTON — The Senate began an around-the-clock talkathon Wednesday over some of President Obama’s nominees as embittered and outnumbered Republicans refused to let the Senate take a break given new, Democratic-driven curbs on Republicans’ power.

click image to enlarge

Reporters pursue Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada, center, on Capitol Hill Wednesday.

The Associated Press

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., threatened to hold the Senate in session through the night to deal with 11 nominations, most of them non-controversial. If Republicans refuse to give up their allotted debate time, the Senate could be in session continuously into Saturday – or longer.

“If we have to work through Christmas, we’re going to do that,” Reid said, repeating what has become one of his regular holiday season refrains.

There was no immediate sign Republicans would relent after Democrats last month changed the Senate’s filibuster procedures to prevent Republicans from blocking Obama’s nominees by themselves.

“The Republicans are wanting to waste more of this body’s time, this country’s time,” Reid said from the Senate floor as Senate aides carted in Listerine, fruit, chocolate and mints for what appeared to be a long night ahead. “We are here ... looking at each other, doing basically nothing as we have done for vast amounts of time because of the Republicans’ obstructionism.”

For minority Republicans, the standoff was less about the qualifications of the slate of nominees than payback for Reid’s move to limit filibusters for judicial nominees.

“The Senate was designed to protect absolutely minority rights,” Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., said. “This isn’t about obstructionism. This is about ‘You limited our rights.”’

The upheaval followed the Democrats’ rules change last month that weakened the Republicans’ ability to block nominations. Using their majority clout, Democrats pared the number of votes needed to end filibusters, or procedural delays, from 60 to a simple majority for most nominations.

Thanks to that change, Democrats muscled two top Obama selections to Senate confirmation on Tuesday: lawyer Patricia Millett to a vacancy on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and Rep. Mel Watt, D-N.C., to head the Federal Housing Finance Agency.

Sen. Mike Johanns, Re-Neb, said, “This is about control of this body.”

Next up was Cornelia “Nina” Pillard, Obama’s choice to join the influential D.C. Circuit court, and 10 other nominees. Unless Republicans agree, Reid said, the vote on Pillard was to occur early Thursday, followed by procedural and confirmation votes on the others, around the clock, well into Saturday. There would be more next week, slated to be the Senate’s final session for the year.

Not necessarily, Reid said.

“If we have to work the weekend before Christmas, we’re going to do that,” he said. “If we have to work Monday before Christmas, we’re going to do that.”

Angry Republicans were unmoved and ominously implied they would continue to use Senate rules to slow action on nominations into the midterm election year.

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors

Further Discussion

Here at we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)