January 24, 2013

Anti-domestic violence program renewal pushed

The Associated Press


Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, a primary sponsor of the re-authorization bill, said the act had funded sexual assault response teams in each county in Maine in the past.

"Maine has one of the lowest crime rates in the country," Collins said. "Tragically, however, half of all murders over the last decade were the result of domestic violence and the number of reported rapes is on the rise. VAWA has provided invaluable support for law enforcement, courts, rape crisis centers, shelters, prevention efforts, community outreach, and programs that provide services for victims and their families."

Sen. Angus King, I-Maine, also signed on as a co-sponsor of the re-authorization bill.

-- Kevin Miller, Washington D.C. Bureau Chief, MaineToday Media

WASHINGTON - Congressional Democrats have renewed their push to revive the key federal program that protects women against domestic violence. They sought to diminish Republican objections that blocked passage of the legislation last year by removing a provision that would increase visas for immigrant victims of domestic abuse.

The Violence Against Women Act became law in 1994 and was extended in 2000 and 2005. But it expired in 2011 and, although both the House and Senate passed VAWA bills last year, the two chambers were unable to agree.

"No woman should ever be forced to suffer in silence in the face of abuse, and Democrats are committed to expanding protections for America's women and giving law enforcement the tools they need to enforce the Violence Against Women Act," House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi said as dozens of House Democratic women, and several men, gathered Wednesday to reintroduce the legislation.

The main points of contention last year were provisions in the Senate-passed bill that increased protections for American Indians, gays and immigrants. Legislation that was introduced in the Senate Tuesday, and the identical bill House Democrats unveiled Wednesday, retain those protections but remove one provision that would increase what are called U visas available to immigrant victims.

House Republicans last year said that was unconstitutional because the Senate imposed a fee to pay for the visa expansion and all revenue-raising measures must be initiated by the House.


Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors

Further Discussion

Here at PressHerald.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)