Wednesday, April 23, 2014
By KEVIN SIEFF The Washington Post
TAROK KOLACHE, Afghanistan - It took 50,000 pounds of American explosives to level Niaz Mohammad's village.
Niaz Mohammad stands on the land that was covered by Tarok Kolache’s houses before Americans bombed the village in 2010. Less than half of the village was rebuilt after the bombardment.
Washington Post photo by Kevin Sieff
The village had become a Taliban stronghold, a virtual factory for bombs that killed and maimed American soldiers. At the height of the U.S. offensive in late 2010, commanders chose what they considered their best option: They approved an airstrike that flattened all the buildings in town, more than 40, including Mohammad's home. Though no civilians were killed, the bombardment quickly became one of the most controversial attacks of the war in Afghanistan.
Three years later, the village is a sandy ruin, symbolizing the gains and losses of America's longest war. A handful of villagers, among them Mohammad, has trickled back. The U.S. Army withdrew this summer from the valley where Tarok Kolache is located. The Taliban have mostly fled to other districts.
Relative peace came to Tarok Kolache, but only after it was demolished.
"What did we win in this war? We lost our homes. We lost our village," said Mohammad, 47, the village's de facto patriarch, with thick black eyebrows and a wavy salt-and-pepper beard. "The Taliban do not live here anymore, but they were only fighting in the first place because the Americans were here."
On the other side of the world, the man who decided to bomb Tarok Kolache, Army Col. David Flynn, sits in his office at a base in Oklahoma, hoping that his "painstaking choice" has paid off.
"I think about Tarok Kolache every day," Flynn said. "There were no good options there."
THE SUBJECT OF MOCKERY
Mohammad was one of the few who have returned to his ancestral village, now only partially rebuilt. In a country still peppered with rusty 40-year-old Russian tanks and long-decayed 130-year-old British forts, Tarok Kolache already feels like another relic of war.
To compensate the villagers for the loss of their 100-year-old homes, the U.S. military built them square, concrete rooms. But those structures -- oddities in a valley of mud-baked dwellings -- are already cracking. Locals refuse to live in them, so the buildings sit empty, full of wasp nests, the subject of mockery. There are still the barbed wire and blast barriers brought here to protect the U.S. base at the edge of the village, constructed after the Tarok Kolache bombing. The base itself has since been dismantled.
Mostly, there are sand, rocks and empty space where there once were homes. Some residents received up to $10,000 in compensation from the U.S. military and moved elsewhere. Some said it was too dangerous to stay in Tarok Kolache after the U.S. base was established. Some said it still smelled like death after several Taliban members were killed. Many claimed the Americans failed to rebuild what they had promised.
"For us, it was like a deadly poison," said Abdul Hamid, a former resident who moved to the nearby city of Kandahar after the operation, claiming he was compensated for only a fraction of his property.
Mohammad felt compelled to go home, though now he wonders whether it was a good idea. His family has been in Tarok Kolache for 150 years, farming acres of nearby land. The Taliban insinuated itself into the village around 2008, turning it into one of the most prolific bomb factories in Kandahar province, according to U.S. officials. Soldiers started referring to its "house-borne improvised explosive devices," a play on "vehicle-borne improvised explosive devices," the military expression for car bombs.
Mohammad and his fellow villagers say they were never supportive of the Taliban; the insurgents had chased or scared many of them out of their homes. But he claims the series of events that ended with the destruction of his village started with the American invasion in 2001. "If the Americans hadn't come, we would still have our village," he said.
The bombing didn't kill any civilians, but it stood out for the scale of its destruction. Before and after satellite pictures released in the aftermath of the attack show a cluster of houses that seemed to vanish into the desert. Crops on nearby land were destroyed.
U.S. officials were quick to call the operation a success. Afghan members of the U.S.-backed government said it was tragic but necessary. Both groups pointed to the proof: The Taliban left Tarok Kolache.
"The other option was to keep patting the ground by hand, looking for IEDs," Flynn said. "After losing several guys, we found it wasn't worth the risk."
Flynn watched as the airstrike was carried out, knowing it would weaken the enemy but infuriate many locals. He thinks his decision, supported by top American commanders, was the right one.
"Leadership isn't about being the most popular guy on the street," he said. "It's about getting the job done and improving a bad environment."
OBJECTIONS FROM MANY
There were objections not only from Afghan civilians but also from American academics and analysts, who said it was an example of the unnecessary use of force. For some outside the military, Tarok Kolache became a symbol of the Afghan war's poor execution.
Mohammad learned about the American debate over Tarok Kolache months after it began raging on blogs and op-ed pages. He asked an English-speaking friend in Kandahar city to search the name of his village on Google. He couldn't believe what he saw -- a seemingly endless back-and-forth about whether Tarok Kolache's destruction was justified.
"It was amazing -- I didn't know we were famous in Tarok Kolache," he said.
U.S. officials said they tried to be systematic about compensating villagers, either rebuilding their homes or paying them to construct new ones elsewhere. But it wasn't always easy or successful.
"We ran into our own bureaucracy," Flynn said.
The U.S. military had a policy of compensating all individuals equally, even though some villagers owned many homes in the village and others had only one.
Fourteen of the homes in Tarok Kolache, for instance, were owned by one man, Abdul Hamid. The U.S. military offered to rebuild one of his structures. He objected, but to little effect. Eventually he decided to leave Tarok Kolache, moving into a small home in Kandahar city, where many former residents of dangerous districts have relocated.
The Afghan government, for its part, hasn't ignored the village, but redevelopment efforts have been uneven. Authorities built a new mosque to replace the one that was destroyed, but they did not replace the village's school, which survived the airstrike only to be taken over by an Afghan army outpost. There are now more than a dozen children living in Tarok Kolache who have nowhere to study.
Some Afghan proponents of the bombing now wonder what the operation's long-term impact will be.
"We're worried about factional tension. We fear that with the foreign troops' departure, the locals will go at each other's throats," said Shah Mohammad, the governor of Kandahar province's Arghandab's district, referring to tensions between supporters and critics of the government.
Others worry that the residents of Tarok Kolache, who were once neutral in the war, have come to sympathize with the Taliban.
"After the bombing, they've become pro-Talib. They're the strongest Taliban supporters in Arghandab," said Naiz Mohammad, the district police chief.