June 29, 2012

House votes AG Holder in contempt

A walkout led by African-American lawmakers had more than 100 Democrats boycotting the vote.

The Associated Press

WASHINGTON - Attorney General Eric Holder on Thursday became the first sitting Cabinet member held in contempt of Congress, a rebuke pushed by Republicans seeking to unearth the facts behind a bungled gun-tracking operation and dismissed by most Democrats as a political stunt.

click image to enlarge

Attorney General Eric Holder

The Associated Press

MAINE REPRESENTATIVES OPPOSE CONTEMPT VOTE

By KEVIN MILLER Staff Writer

Maine's two U.S. representatives expressed their opposition Thursday to holding Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt of Congress.

Democrat Mike Michaud, who represents the 2nd District, was among 67 representatives who voted "no" on a resolution that made Holder the first member of a presidential Cabinet to be found in contempt of Congress.

Democrat Chellie Pingree, who represents the 1st District, joined more than 100 other Democrats who symbolically left the House chamber during the vote.

The contempt motion passed on a vote of 255-67.

It was unclear late Thursday afternoon how Michaud would vote. He was among 31 Democrats who signed on to a letter to President Obama last year urging Holder and the Department of Justice to comply with congressional inquiries on the issue.

But Michaud eventually sided with the vast majority of his party.

He was, however, among the relatively small number of Democrats who subsequently voted to allow the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform to use the court system to pursue subpoenas with the Department of Justice. Pingree voted against authorization.

"Based on the facts, I determined that the attorney general was not in contempt of Congress, but it is still not clear whether DOJ has complied fully with the committee's subpoena," Michaud said in a statement released Thursday evening. "That is why I voted to authorize the House to take the matter to court, where it can be resolved in a nonpartisan fashion."

Staff Writer Kevin Miller can be contact at 249-8511 or at:

kmiller@mainetoday.com

The vote was 255-67, with more than 100 Democrats boycotting.

African-American lawmakers led the walkout as members filed up the aisle and out of the chamber to protest the action against Holder, who is the nation's first black attorney general.

Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi of California joined the boycott, saying Republicans had gone "over the edge" in their partisanship.

Seventeen Democrats voted with Republicans in favor of the contempt vote, while two Republicans -- Reps. Scott Rigell of Virginia and Steven LaTourette of Ohio -- joined other Democrats in voting No.

The National Rifle Association pressed hard for the contempt resolution, leaning on members of both parties who want to stay in the NRA's good graces. Holder said afterward the vote was merely a politically motivated act in an election year

Republicans cited Holder's refusal to hand over -- without any preconditions -- documents that could explain why the Obama administration initially denied that a risky "gun-walking" investigative tactic was used in Operation Fast and Furious, which allowed hundreds of guns to be smuggled from Arizona to Mexico.

The vote on a criminal contempt resolution sent the matter to the U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, who is under Holder.

A separate vote on civil contempt passed 258-95. It will allow the House to go to court in an effort to force Holder to turn over the documents.

In past cases, courts have been reluctant to settle disputes between the executive and legislative branches of government.

During the debate before the vote, Republicans said they were seeking answers for the Michigan family of Brian Terry, a Border Patrol agent killed in December 2010 in a shootout with Mexican bandits. Two guns from Fast and Furious were found at the scene.

Democrats insisted that they, too, wanted the Terry family to have all the facts, but argued that only a more thorough, bipartisan investigation would accomplish that.

The NRA urged House members to vote for contempt, contending the administration wanted to use Operation Fast and Furious to win gun control measures. Democrats who normally support the NRA but who vote against the contempt citations would lose any 100 percent ratings from the group.

That could affect whether they get endorsements from the powerful organization, particularly if Republican opponents surface who are strong NRA backers.

But a former NRA board member and the longest-serving House member, Rep. John Dingell of Michigan, argued that gun control was not at issue. He failed in an attempt to head off the contempt votes.

The Congressional Black Caucus, explaining its boycott, said in a letter to the House that "Contempt power should be used sparingly, carefully and only in the most egregious situations" and the GOP leadership had "articulated no legislative purpose for pursuing this course of action."

The dispute is both legal and political. Republicans asserted their right to obtain documents needed for an investigation of Operation Fast and Furious -- focusing on 10 months in 2011 after the Obama administration initially denied guns were allowed to "walk" from Arizona to Mexico.

By year's end, the administration acknowledged the assertion was wrong.

President Obama asserted a broad form of executive privilege, a legal position designed to keep executive branch documents from being disclosed. The assertion ensures that documents will not be turned over anytime soon, unless a deal is reached between the administration and congressional Republicans.

Gun-walking long has been barred by Justice Department policy, but federal agents in Arizona experimented with it in at least two investigations during the George W. Bush administration before Operation Fast and Furious.

The agents in Arizona lost track of several hundred weapons in that operation.

 

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors




Further Discussion

Here at PressHerald.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)