Thursday, December 12, 2013
By PAUL ELIAS The Associated Press
SAN FRANCISCO - Sara Kruzan was 17 when she was sentenced to die in prison for killing and robbing a pimp in a motel in the Southern California city of Riverside.
Sara Kruzan is pictured in a March 2012 photo. Now 34, she was a 16-year-old prostitute in 1994 when she shot and killed her 36-year-old pimp in a Riverside, Calif., motel. The next year, she was convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to life without parole.
California Department of Corrections/The Associated Press
Daniel Horowitz, left, a California defense attorney whose wife was killed by Scott Dyleski, then 16, right, in 2005, opposes releasing Dyleski and most of the thousands of other juveniles convicted of murder who were sentenced to life without parole. But Horowitz says Sara Kruzan may warrant an exception because of her life story, which includes sexual abuse at a young age.
2006 File Photos/The Associated Press
Now, at 34, Kruzan has a chance at being freed, along with thousands of other juveniles convicted of murder who were sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole.
Those life sentences are coming under increased attack from activists, lawmakers and even the U.S. Supreme Court, which recently struck down mandatory life-without-parole sentences for juveniles as unconstitutional "cruel and unusual" punishment. On Thursday, the California Assembly passed a bill by the slimmest of margins that would give juvenile lifers in that state a shot at freedom.
Nationwide, there are roughly 2,500 inmates who killed as juveniles that are serving life in prison without parole, including 309 California inmates serving such sentences, according to the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.
"Because their brain is still developing, they have the ability to rehabilitate," said Michael Harris, a senior attorney at the National Center for Youth Law. "They are more likely to rehabilitate than an adult."
Despite the legal rulings and the legislative activity, some survivors of people killed by juveniles are pushing back and arguing that a life sentence is appropriate punishment for juveniles who commit heinous murders.
"They say they deserve a second chance, but the victims don't get a second chance," said Maggie Elvey, whose husband, Ross, was beaten to death with a metal pipe by two teenagers during the 1993 robbery of his gun shop in Vista, Calif.
She called Thursday a "sad day" because of the California Assembly's passage of a bill introduced by state Sen. Leland Yee, D-San Francisco.
The bill allows lifers to seek a sentence of 25 years to life with a chance for parole after serving 15 years. It passed the state Senate last year but failed repeatedly in the Assembly before Democratic lawmakers approved it by a single vote after a heated debate.
The bill moves back to the state Senate for final approval. Passage is expected.
Criminal defense lawyer Daniel Horowitz largely sides with Elvey.
Horowitz's wife, Pamela Vitale, was murdered in 2005 by Scott Dyleski, then 16, who is now serving life without parole. Dyleski was convicted of bludgeoning and stabbing Vitale during the burglary of her Lafayette, Calif., home.
Releasing most of the thousands of juvenile lifers "would open the gates of hell," Horowitz said.
"We aren't trying to punish these young people," he said. "We are trying to protect the public from this happening again."
Still, Horowitz said Kruzan may warrant an exception because of her compelling life story, which includes sexual abuse at a young age.
Kruzan's case began to garner widespread publicity in 2010 after Human Rights Watch posted a six-minute interview with her on YouTube that received 300,000 hits.
The year culminated with Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger commuting her sentence to 25 years to life with the possibility of parole on Dec. 31, 2010, his last full day in office.
Schwarzenegger said he still considered her guilty of first-degree murder, but he sympathized with her defense that the man she killed had sexually abused her and served as her pimp for years.
"Given Ms. Kruzan's age at the time of the murder, and considering the significant abuse she suffered at his hands, I believe Ms. Kruzan's sentence is excessive," the governor wrote in his commutation message, "it is apparent that Ms. Kruzan suffered significant abuse starting at a vulnerable age."
Today, Kruzan is fighting for an even bigger reduction of her prison sentence, arguing that she killed her pimp as a result of "intimate partner abuse," a defense that has until now been limited to battered wives and girlfriends.
(Continued on page 2)