Thursday, April 24, 2014
By MICHAEL DOYLE McClatchy Washington Bureau
Eric Holder may have thought he knew what he was in for before he became the U.S. attorney general.
Attorney General Eric Holder, the nation’s top law enforcement official, is sworn in Wednesday before testifying at a House Judiciary Committee oversight hearing.
The Associated Press
FBI LOOKS FOR POTENTIAL
CRIMES IN IRS TARGETING
OF CONSERVATIVE GROUPS
Attorney General Eric Holder said the FBI's criminal investigation of the Internal Revenue Service could include potential civil rights violations, false statements and potential violations of the Hatch Act, which prohibits federal employees from engaging in some partisan political activities.
Holder, testifying to the House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday, was asked what criminal charges could be pursued against IRS employees. Holder announced Tuesday that the Justice Department was the investigating the IRS after the agency acknowledged that agents had singled out conservative groups for extra scrutiny when they applied for tax-exempt status.
Holder also says it will take time to determine if there was criminal wrongdoing.
In other testimony, Holder told Congress that a serious national security leak required the secret gathering of telephone records at The Associated Press, as he stood by an investigation in which he insisted he had no involvement.
Pestered by Republicans and some Democrats, Holder testified that he has faith in the individuals conducting the broad investigation, driven in large part by GOP outrage last year over the possibility that administration officials leaked information to enhance President Obama's national security reputation in an election year.
Holder said he had recused himself from the case because "I am a possessor of information eventually leaked." He said he was unable to answer questions on the subpoenas and why the Justice Department failed to negotiate with the AP prior to the subpoenas, a standard practice.
That elicited frustration from some committee members with the Obama administration and the attorney general.
"There doesn't appear to be any acceptance of responsibility for things that have gone wrong," Rep. James Sensenbrenner, R-Wis., told Holder. He suggested that administration officials travel to the Harry S. Truman Presidential Library and take a photo of the famous sign "The buck stops here."
-- The Associated Press
"The years I spent in government taught me a lot," the former judge and federal prosecutor assured the Senate Judiciary Committee on Jan. 15, 2009. "With the benefit of hindsight, I can see my errors clearly, and I can tell you how I have learned from them."
But four years after his relatively pain-free Senate confirmation, Holder sizzles on the political hot seat. For reasons both trumped up and genuine, he's a repeat target for conservative and liberal critics alike. Though there's no public sign he's leaving soon, his career has entered the dangerous stage of insiders speculating about how long he'll stick it out.
On Wednesday, the 62-year-old Columbia Law School graduate faced the latest in a series of Capitol Hill interrogations, with tough questions from both parties on several topics, including an aggressive Justice Department leak investigation.
"There's been a lot of criticism," Holder acknowledged at the hearing before the House Judiciary Committee.
Some tough talk has been predictably partisan, as when Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus this week urged Holder to resign. Other harsh assessments come from left field, as when liberal former MSNBC personality Keith Olbermann echoed Priebus. While their rhetoric may be dismissed as unpersuasive posturing, together these polar political opposites suggest how Holder's fate has gotten a one-two punch from the latest revelations.
On Monday, The Associated Press revealed that Justice Department investigators had secretly seized two months' worth of telephone records from the news organization. The records, which the AP said covered 20 home and office lines used by reporters, were taken as part of an inquiry into the leak of classified information.
"I'm concerned," Rep. Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif., said Wednesday. "The damage done to a free press is substantial, and will continue until corrective action is taken."
Separately, the Justice Department is investigating revelations that the Internal Revenue Service targeted conservative tea party organizations for tax-related scrutiny.
Technically, Holder stands apart from both quagmires. He recused himself from the AP investigation, explaining Wednesday that Deputy Attorney General James Cole authorized the subpoenas for the telephone records. Whatever the IRS did wasn't his responsibility, as the tax agency is part of the Treasury Department.
But some have already made up their minds.
In mid-June 2012, saying he was acting "with regret," Republican Sen. John Cornyn of Texas called on Holder to resign over the botched "Fast and Furious" gun-running operation, in which Mexican-based gangsters were allowed to buy firearms to help trace the trafficking of illegal weapons. Two weeks later, with 108 Democrats abstaining in protest, the Republican-controlled House of Representatives voted to hold the attorney general in contempt for withholding documents.
It was the first time the nation's top law enforcement officer had been found in contempt of Congress.
It was largely a symbolic gesture, as the Justice Department wouldn't enforce it. But it hinted that some Republicans might attack Holder as a proxy for their broader assault on President Obama, with whom he is friends, and Obama's policies.
Still, the contempt vote wasn't entirely one-sided, as 17 Democrats voted for the measure.
The Justice Department's Office of the Inspector General subsequently concluded, in a 514-page report, that a "series of misguided strategies, tactics, errors in judgment and management failures" plagued the Fast and Furious operation. At the same time, the investigators concluded that Holder had no part in misleading Congress and had largely been left in the dark by subordinates who "should have promptly informed" him of the troubled operation.
(Continued on page 2)