December 5, 2012

Senate passes $631 billion defense bill

The measure includes a military pay raise and limits the president's authority to transfer terror suspects.

The Associated Press

WASHINGTON - The Senate overwhelmingly approved a sweeping, $631 billion defense bill Tuesday that sends a clear signal to President Obama to move quickly to get U.S. combat troops out of Afghanistan, tightens sanctions on Iran and limits the president's authority in handling terror suspects.

FUNDING FOR MAINE: BIW DESTROYERS, KITTERY SHIP REPAIR

WASHINGTON - The Senate's defense spending authorization bill contains funding for a host of programs that involve Maine contractors and companies, although precisely how and where that money would be spent will be decided later.

Funding levels for programs with Maine ties include:

$3 billion for the U.S. Navy's Arleigh Burke-class destroyers and $669 million for Zumwalt-class destroyers, both of which are built at Bath Iron Works.

$6.3 billion for Navy ship and submarine repair and maintenance, a portion of which will likely go to the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard in Kittery.

$412 million for the National Guard for the type of depot maintenance work performed at Maine Military Authority in Limestone.

$6.9 billion for F-35 Joint Strike Fighter aircraft, components of which are built at Pratt & Whitney in North Berwick and at General Dynamics in Saco.

Maine Sens. Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins co-sponsored numerous amendments attached to the bill. Collins, a member of both the Armed Services and the Appropriations committees, will also serve on the conference committee charged with working out a compromise between the differing House and Senate bills.

-- Kevin Miller, Washington bureau chief for Maine Today Media

 

Ignoring a veto threat, the Senate voted 98-0 for the legislation that authorizes money for weapons, aircraft and ships and provides a 1.7 percent pay raise for military personnel. After a decade of increasing Pentagon budgets, the vote came against the backdrop of significant reductions in projected military spending and the threat of deeper cuts from the looming "fiscal cliff" of automatic spending cuts and tax increases.

The bill reflects the nation's war-weariness after more than a decade of fighting in Afghanistan, the messy uncertainty about new threats to U.S. security, and Washington belt-tightening in times of trillion-dollar-plus deficits. Spending solely on the base defense budget has nearly doubled in the past 10 years, but the latest blueprint reins in the projected growth in military dollars.

The bill would provide $526 billion for the base defense budget, $17 billion for defense programs in the Energy Department and about $88 billion for the war in Afghanistan. House and Senate negotiators must reconcile their competing versions of the bill in the next few weeks.

"The major challenge is time," Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl Levin, D-Mich., told reporters after the vote.

Reacting to the relentless violence in Syria, the Senate voted 92-6 to require the Pentagon to report to Congress on the ability of the U.S. military to impose a no-fly zone over Syria.

The amendment specified that it should not be construed as a declaration of war or an authorization to use force.

Last year, Obama and congressional Republicans agreed on nearly $500 billion in defense cuts over 10 years. If the two sides fail in the next month to avert the "fiscal cliff," the Pentagon would face an additional $55 billion in automatic, across-the-board cuts after Jan. 1.

Not far from the Capitol, a coalition of retired military leaders, administration officials and lawmakers pleaded with the president and Congress to address the nation's debt, calling it the greatest threat to national security. The group of prominent Republicans and Democrats said the United States can spend less on defense while still maintaining its military superiority.

"A strong economy and strong national security are inextricably linked," said retired Adm. Mike Mullen, the former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

The administration has threatened to veto the Senate bill, strongly objecting to a provision restricting the president's authority to transfer terror suspects from the U.S. prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to foreign countries. The provision is in current law.

 

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors




Further Discussion

Here at PressHerald.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)