April 3, 2010

Oxford County casino proposal to stand alone in November vote

Legislators postpone a broader proposal that included gaming tables at Hollywood Slots.


AUGUSTA — The House voted Friday to indefinitely postpone action on a controversial gambling measure, reversing an earlier vote and all but ensuring that a citizens initiative for a casino in Oxford County will appear alone on November's ballot.

The 83-59 vote to table a broader competing bill, L.D. 1808, means that Black Bear Entertainment's proposal to build a resort casino in western Maine will stand on its own merits.

The deciding vote came at the suggestion of Rep. Pamela Jabar Trinward, D-Waterville, co-chairwoman of the Legal and Veterans Affairs Committee, which oversees gambling.

Two days earlier, the House had rejected the committee's recommendation to kill the broader bill. Friday's vote came as Democrats met to discuss the issue, following a brief floor debate.

Rep. Stacey Fitts, R-Pittsfield, spoke against the vote to postpone action.

He had supported the competing measure that, if passed by voters in November, would have expanded gambling not just with the casino in Oxford County, but by adding table games to Hollywood Slots in Bangor and allowing the Passamaquoddy Tribe to go forward with a longstanding request to build a casino in Calais.

He said the decision not to add a competing measure was postponing a much-needed discussion about gambling.

"The issue, for me, is whether this Legislature has the guts to take on this issue, or would rather punt," Fitts said during debate Friday.

Rep. James Martin, D-Orono, joined with Fitts to modify the amendment, after Martin had dropped his own idea to create a study group on gambling, using an expanded Hollywood Slots with table games as a test case.

Martin compared the complexity of the gambling question with gay marriage and asked his House colleagues to step up and debate the issue.

Other Democrats, led by Rep. Linda Valentino, D-Saco, and Rep. Thom Watson, D-Bath, were ready to support a second competing option to the Oxford County initiative, to allow expanded gambling under a competitive bidding process managed by the state. Neither spoke before Friday's vote.

The Legislature has the authority to adopt a citizen initiative as written, reject it or propose an alternative. If it rejects it, the issue goes before voters statewide. If it proposes an alternative, the measure goes to voters along with the original proposal.


MaineToday Media State House Reporter Ethan Wilensky-Lanford can be contacted at 620-7015 or at:



Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors

Further Discussion

Here at PressHerald.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)