Thursday, May 23, 2013
By Ann S. Kim firstname.lastname@example.org
Kennebunk police disclosed the ages and addresses of 21 alleged "johns" of Zumba instructor Alexis Wright on Tuesday after a judge, amid criticism that releasing only the names could unfairly tarnish people with similar names, reversed his decision on what information could be released.
Several satellite trucks were stationed on Route 1 in Kennebunk on Tuesday, across the street from a former Zumba studio implicated in a prostitution scandal.
Carl D. Walsh/Staff Photographer
The first group to be charged with engaging a prostitute, which is a misdemeanor, includes at least one public figure, former South Portland Mayor James A. Soule.
Soule, 58, held the largely ceremonial position most recently in 2008. His attorney, Peter DeTroy, said Soule, now a resident of Fort Myers, Fla., regrets his actions.
"People behave at times in ways that, in retrospect, they wish they hadn't," DeTroy said. "That doesn't make them bad people."
The highly anticipated first round of names, from a list that reportedly contains as many as 150, was released to the media Monday without any other identifying information such as ages, addresses or hometowns.
The Portland Press Herald, among other media outlets, did not immediately publish the names because of the risk of misidentification.
The limited release caused confusion about who had been charged in the case, which has brought national media attention to Kennebunk. Television trucks from networks, Portland stations and Boston stations were parked downtown there Tuesday afternoon.
Authorities say in court documents that Wright's Zumba studio in town served as a front for prostitution, and that they found "meticulous" client records, hours of sex tapes and evidence that the sex acts would have generated $150,000.
Those documents have fueled speculation about Wright's alleged clients, particularly because people who are familiar with the list say it includes prominent figures.
Superior Court Justice Thomas Warren ruled Tuesday that the addresses of the 21 defendants could be released. On Monday, he had ruled that while the names were public information, Kennebunk police had to withhold the addresses of defendants who may be victims of violation of privacy by Wright and her alleged partner, Mark Strong Sr. of Thomaston.
The two are accused of secretly recording sexual encounters in Wright's studio and office.
MaineToday Media, parent company of the Portland Press Herald/Maine Sunday Telegram, filed motions in Cumberland County Superior Court on Tuesday to persuade Warren to reconsider his original ruling.
The judge issued Tuesday's ruling during a telephone conference call that a reporter attended with permission from the court. Warren had not filed a written order explaining his decision by Tuesday evening.
The Press Herald's attorney, Sigmund Schutz, expressed appreciation that Warren amended his order within a few hours of the filing.
"It's for the protection of everybody that the criminal justice system works in the light of day. And that includes the names and identities of people charged with crimes -- big crimes and little crimes," Schutz said.
The newspaper argued that while a crime victim's address can be kept confidential, the records in question have to do with individuals' status as criminal defendants.
"The fact that an individual may appear in records held by the town of Kennebunk in two different capacities -- one as an alleged perpetrator of a crime, a second time as an alleged victim of a crime -- does not make his address confidential for all purposes," the motion said.
Warren was presiding in a case brought by two of the alleged "johns," who tried to block the release of names and the prosecution of their cases.
Their lawyer, Stephen Schwartz, argued several points regarding the privacy rights of his clients, saying their reputations and relationships would be harmed by the release of their names.
He said the only damage the defendants -- police and prosecutors -- would suffer was "the inability to continue to appeal to the prurient interests of society in an effort to stoke public scandal and outrage."
(Continued on page 2)