January 3, 2013

Police saw no reason for arrest before Biddeford slayings

By David Hench dhench@pressherald.com
Staff Writer

Police said Wednesday that there was no legal reason to arrest James Pak before two Biddeford teenagers who were his tenants were shot to death in a confrontation with him on Saturday night.

click image to enlarge

A makeshift memorial stands across from 17 Sokokis Road in Biddeford, where Derrick Thompson and Alivia Welch were shot dead Saturday.

Shawn Patrick Ouellette / Staff Photographer

click image to enlarge

James Pak


Related headlines

Experts, meanwhile, said it would be unusual for police to ask about the presence of guns during a typical landlord-tenant dispute, but appropriate if someone threatened to shoot another person.

Pak, described in documents as 67 or 74 years old, is being held without bail in the York County Jail on two charges of murder in the shooting deaths of Derrick Thompson, 19, and Alivia Welch, 18, on Saturday night.

Pak also is accused of shooting Thompson's mother, Susan Johnson, 44, who survived.

Police were first called to 17 Sokokis Road, in a neighborhood of single-family homes on the outskirts of the city, when Thompson reported that Pak was yelling and threatening him and banging on the door of the apartment attached to Pak's home.

Officer Edward Dexter responded, and after 32 minutes told the dispatcher, "This was a civil issue and the caller did not feel threatened at any time," according to a summary of radio communications provided by Biddeford police.

That appears to be at odds with a state police affidavit in support of Pak's arrest on murder charges. In that affidavit, police say: "Thompson told Officer Dexter that Pak claimed he was going to shoot them and made a hand motion in front of them."

The affidavit does not elaborate on what Pak said, but does say that Johnson didn't believe Pak would hurt them, even when he came into the apartment a few minutes later with a handgun.

The tenants' response to Pak's statements is essential to whether Pak could have been charged with criminal threatening before the shooting.

State law says that a person commits criminal threatening, a misdemeanor, "if he intentionally or knowingly places another person in fear of imminent bodily injury."

If the target of the threat does not fear imminent injury, there is no crime, according to the law.

"Officers would have arrested Pak if the elements of the crime were met, period," Biddeford Deputy Police Chief JoAnne Fisk said Wednesday.

Criminal threatening is a misdemeanor charge and, for someone with no criminal record, usually results in very low bail.

Two hours after Pak's arrest Saturday, his blood alcohol content was 0.15 percent, almost twice the legal limit to drive.

But police would not characterize Pak's demeanor or level of intoxication or what he said to police after Thompson's initial call around 6:15 p.m., when Pak and the tenants were told by officers to keep away from each other.

Pak was arrested three hours after the shootings, which occurred shortly before 7 p.m., and it's not clear whether he drank before the deadly encounter.

Biddeford police referred further questions about the initial encounter between Pak and his tenants to the state police, who are investigating the homicide.

Fisk would not release transcripts of the 911 tape, referring that request to state police because of the ongoing investigation.

Policing experts said it can be difficult to foresee when a verbal altercation will turn violent, though when someone threatens to shoot a person, closer scrutiny is needed to determine whether the threat is legitimate.

Police are often called for landlord-tenant disputes over issues like rent and parking, said William Baker, a Westbrook official who was the city's police chief and served as commissioner of the Massachusetts Department of Public Safety.

The vast majority are civil disputes that require no police action, Baker said.

"I think this result is extremely unusual and, in my view, not foreseeable," Baker said.

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors

Further Discussion

Here at PressHerald.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)