July 17, 2013

Railway's Maine lines inspected recently

U.S. officials won't release the results as they prepare for a more thorough look this week sparked by the deadly crash in Quebec.

By Eric Russell erussell@pressherald.com
Staff Writer

(Continued from page 1)

The train that derailed was carrying volatile crude oil on a run that was to cross Maine en route to a refinery in New Brunswick.

In 2011, only 25,000 barrels of crude oil was carried through Maine on trains. In 2012, the total was 5.2 million barrels. In the first five months of 2013, some 3.4 million barrels of crude was carried through the state on trains.

"We believe an appropriate response to this tragedy is to gain a full and complete understanding of the existing infrastructure being used to transport crude oil and gas in Maine," Pingree and Michaud wrote in their letter to Federal Railroad Administration officials.

Pingree is married to S. Donald Sussman, majority share owner of MaineToday Media, which publishes the Press Herald.

Gov. Paul LePage has directed the Maine Department of Transportation to do an independent review of all freight safety records compiled by the rail administration. A review by the department in 2006 showed that more than 90 percent of Maine's 1,100 miles of railroads were not equipped to handle the weight of rail cars loaded with oil.

Danny Gilbert, president of Rail Safety Consultants in Roanoke, Va., said he is not surprised that such a catastrophic event has prompted scrutiny of the entire industry's infrastructure.

"I would venture to say some of the reaction is going to be knee-jerk," he said Tuesday. "Sometimes politicians come out and say, 'We're going to change this,' but you really don't change anything. The rules are there to prevent things like this.

"At the same time, though, it can be a wake-up call for any areas that might be faltering," he said.

Montreal, Maine & Atlantic Chairman Ed Burkhardt has asked federal officials to hold off on the inspection in Maine until the crash investigation is complete, but Pingree and Michaud announced Monday that the railroad administration will begin its inspection Thursday.

The administration regularly conducts unannounced inspections as part of its Automated Track Inspection Program. Thompson, the spokesman, said regular inspections have helped lead to a 42 percent decrease in train derailments nationwide, with a 14 percent decrease in Maine in the last decade.

A report in June by the Government Accountability Office revealed that the railroad administration has 470 inspectors in its headquarters and regional offices, and 170 state inspectors. By comparison, the U.S. rail system consists of 760 railroads with 230,000 employees and 200,000 miles of operating track.

Because the administration is so small relative to the industry, the railroads themselves are the primary guarantors of safety, the report said.

Gilbert, who has worked in the rail industry for nearly 50 years, said he doesn't think a lack of scrutiny by federal officials is the problem.

"Every railroad has its own safety procedures and most are pretty good," he said. "What I've read about this accident is that it was a human failure."

Burkhardt said Monday that Montreal, Maine & Atlantic's tracks are in "fair to good condition, but not as good as we'd like it to be." He did not elaborate, nor did he talk about whether the company has made infrastructure investments.

The condition and inspections of Maine's railroads were a topic of discussion even before the derailment. In 2006, the Department of Transportation published a report that said budget constraints, decreased federal dollars and limited investment by railroad companies threatened to deteriorate the infrastructure.

Last year, the American Society of Civil Engineers gave Maine's railroads a grade of C.

From 2006 through 2012, track conditions were cited as the primary cause of 10 of Montreal, Maine & Atlantic Railway's 19 derailments reported to the Federal Railroad Administration. The majority of those derailments were relatively minor incidents without spills or injuries.

Eric Russell can be contacted at 791-6344 or at:

erussell@pressherald.com

Twitter: @PPHEricRussell 

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors




Further Discussion

Here at PressHerald.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)