June 1, 2012

Teacher-training veto overturned

Meanwhile, the House sustains the veto of a bond proposal to fund R&D investments.

By Susan McMillan smcmillan@centralmaine.com
Staff Writer

AUGUSTA — Capping this year's session, legislators on Thursday overturned Gov. Paul LePage's veto of a teacher-training bill and upheld three other vetoes by the governor.

The House and Senate both cleared the two-thirds majority to push through scholarships for teachers seeking National Board Certification and salary stipends for those who do.

Meanwhile, the Senate voted in favor of a $20 million bond proposal to fund research and development investments, which was promoted as a job-creating measure. The House, however, sustained a veto of the bond proposal, as well as vetoes of bills that limited the Maine Government Facilities Authority's borrowing powers and allowed fraternal and veterans' organizations to operate slot machines.

The bond proposal would have sent voters a request to borrow $20 million for the Maine Technology Asset Fund, a competitive awards program that supports capital improvements for research and development projects.

The Senate voted to override LePage's veto by 29-6, but the House vote was 88-53, falling short of the threshold of 94 votes. The House previously voted 99-41 in favor of the bond, but 13 Republicans changed positions.

Echoing the objections in LePage's veto message, House Speaker Robert Nutting, R-Oakland, said many Republicans had concerns about the state borrowing more money and where the awards go.

Rep. Kerri Prescott, R-Topsham, said policy makers must make research and development a priority in the general fund budget rather than issuing bonds.

House Democratic leader Emily Cain of Orono said on the House floor that it is not a coincidence that Maine is last in the country for research and development investment and last in personal income growth.

Bill sponsor Sen. Chris Rector, R-Thomaston, said he was disappointed that the House sustained the veto, but a similar bond package will come back in the next Legislature.

LePage's spokeswoman Adrienne Bennett said the governor wants to improve the return on investment of the award program by focusing more on the private sector and on the commercialization phase.

LePage's veto of the teacher-training bill caused less controversy among legislators, who voted 26-9 in the Senate and 129-12 in the House to override.

The bill, L.D. 1781, establishes a scholarship fund for public school and private town academy teachers applying to become National Board Certified, which costs $2,500 and can take up to three years. It also increases to $2,500 a state stipend for teachers are board-certified.

The bill received no opposition in the Education and Cultural Affairs Committee or on the floors of the House and Senate, and Education Commissioner Stephen Bowen supported it.

But LePage vetoed the bill, calling it a Band-Aid and accusing the Maine Education Association of devoting more attention to politics than improving teacher quality, including members' vote to endorse the upcoming same-sex marriage referendum. A small smiley face appears next to the signature on his veto message.

A handful of legislators spoke in favor of overriding the teacher-training veto on Thursday, and none spoke in opposition.

Education committee Senate Chairman Brian Langley, R-Ellsworth, said that until Thursday morning, he was inclined to sustain the veto. He said he probably opened himself to criticism by changing his mind and encouraging other senators to override.

He said he believed LePage vetoed the bill to spur discussion of a broader effort to help teachers improve, but the administration and the teachers union are "at loggerheads."

MEA President Chris Galgay said he was grateful Langley stood up for the program, and he believed it swayed the Senate, which voted before the House.

Bill sponsor and Senate Assistant Minority Leader Justin Alfond, D-Portland, said legislators made their decision based on the demonstrated effectiveness of National Board Certified teachers.

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors

Further Discussion

Here at PressHerald.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)