January 6, 2013

The battle for Bald Mountain

A potential conflict between badly needed jobs and protecting the environment takes shape as Maine revises its mining rules.

By North Cairn ncairn@pressherald.com
Staff Writer

(Continued from page 1)

Today's poll: Bald Mountain mining

Should the state allow a company to mine for gold, silver and other deposits on Aroostook County’s Bald Mountain?

Yes

No

View Results

click image to enlarge

Bald Mountain, with Greenlaw Pond in the foreground, is owned by J.D. Irving of New Brunswick, which is considering mining the property for gold, silver and other deposits under rules the state is in the process of revising.

Natural Resources Council of Maine photo

"This is a very high-risk way to get jobs," St. Pierre said.

Mining operations here, in a wet region that gets 45 inches of precipitation a year and is dotted with small lakes and ponds, would represent "a completely different environment than what has been done in the western U.S.," he said.

St. Pierre contends that the unbroken tracts of forest in northern Maine represent a national treasure, the last relatively untouched place in the East, with a value beyond economic measure.

He is apprehensive about disruption and degradation of the ecosystems, potential damage to water and especially about what will be done with the tailings, the materials left over after the desired metals are extracted.

The perceived lack of information about how these issues are to be resolved has raised alarm among some residents and an array of environmental organizations -- from in-state and beyond -- including the Natural Resources Council of Maine.

The council recently redoubled its opposition to open-pit mining in Maine by blasting the DEP's choice of the North Jackson Co. to serve as a consultant to help draft the new mining rules.

Pete Didisheim, director of advocacy for the council, a nonprofit environmental organization in Augusta, said the choice of the company represented the "outsourcing" of work that should be done by the technical and professional staff of DEP. He also alleged that the company had misrepresented its credentials and experience by stating in its bid for the $178,000 job that it had been involved in a similar rule revision in Michigan.

The DEP has stood behind its decision to hire North Jackson and has denied the claim that the company was not involved in the rewriting of Michigan's mining rules, experience that the department cited as important in its choice to accept the North Jackson bid.

The company's chief financial officer Daniel Wiitala, however, acknowledged that North Jackson had no direct role or responsibility in the Michigan project, but contracted with a mining company representative who was involved in the process. Officials at North Jackson felt that his experience would be expertise enough for the Maine work, Wiitala said.

Jackson, the Allagash senator and one of the sponsors of the mining bill, said he doesn't want to second-guess the DEP's decision to hire the Michigan contractor, the sole bidder on the project.

"I'm not involved in what the department does," he said. Jackson added that he anticipated conflict over the new mining rules. Environmentalists could be expected to face off with the mining companies and anyone they believed to be pressing mining interests in Maine, he said.

But Jackson said he thinks the DEP should be left alone to get its work done. "You'd like to have numerous (bidders)" on state projects, he said, "but the process has got to play out."

Didisheim has charged that the Michigan contractor is too closely aligned with mining companies to produce a balanced set of rules, and he questions whether the company will represent the interests and concerns of all the constituencies involved -- including local communities, conservationists, environmental advocates and mining companies.

He has called for a transparent process that allows enough time and sufficient opportunities around the state for public feedback on the draft rules, before they go to the Legislature.

"That's what I want," Jackson said. There must be public hearings that allow people to express their fears and hopes, and the process must be transparent, he said, because this is not just a fight with special interests but a struggle over Maine's economic sustainability and the shaping of its future.

Staff Writer North Cairn can be contacted at 791-6325 or at:

ncairn@mainetoday.com

 

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors




Further Discussion

Here at PressHerald.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)


Today's poll: Bald Mountain mining

Should the state allow a company to mine for gold, silver and other deposits on Aroostook County’s Bald Mountain?

Yes

No

View Results