February 15, 2012

Bill Nemitz: Tip for Maine GOP – First collect votes, then name winner

Mercifully, the decision on which presidential candidates get which of Maine's 24 delegates to the national convention won't be made until the Republican state convention in May.

By Bill Nemitz bnemitz@pressherald.com

Someone turn off the irony alarm. By now, the whole world knows the Maine Republican Party, which spent much of the past year telling us how to run our elections, can't even manage its own statewide caucuses.

"I didn't make the rules, the party made the rules," said Maine GOP Chairman Charlie Webster in a telephone interview Tuesday morning. "I've got 900 emails and I'm just going click, gone, click, gone ... not even opening them."

He has good reason. The vast majority of those emails are from away – and they're not exactly flattering in their portrayal of Maine's latest foray into GOP presidential politics.

"This is an outrage," fumed John Tate, campaign manager for Ron Paul 2012, in an email to supporters after results from the non-binding poll were announced Saturday to show who Maine Republicans prefer for president.

That would be Mitt Romney, at least for now. As he lurches toward what many still consider his inevitable coronation at the Republican National Convention in August, the former Massachusetts governor got the boost he so desperately needed with a 194-vote win over libertarian upstart Ron Paul.

Or did he?

First, this being a tragic comedy and all, let's set the stage:

A few weeks ago, Maine wasn't even a speed bump on the road to the GOP nomination. Aside from Paul, who figured he might pick up a few national delegates here while no one else was looking, few knew exactly how this caucus thing was supposed to work, and fewer still much cared.

But then Rick Santorum hit the trifecta on Feb. 7 with wins in the Minnesota and Colorado caucuses and the Missouri primary.

And there stood Romney, who was supposed to have this whole thing wrapped up by now, badly in need of another win. Any win. Even a Maine-non-binding-straw-poll win.

Put more simply, the national spotlight suddenly and unexpectedly turned on Maine – where most (but not all) of the caucuses were to be held no later than Saturday and all (or at least most) of the results were to be released just in time for Saturday's network news.

Now let's go to the replay.

We begin with Washington County, where Saturday's local caucuses – all to be held under one roof at Washington Academy – were postponed because of a snowstorm.

According to Chris Gardner, the county's GOP chairman, the decision was made only after he polled his 20 or so town chairs Friday evening and all agreed that the wintry forecast sounded too ominous to go ahead with the caucuses.

"We decided to put people before politics and err on the side of caution," Gardner said. "So that was it. Not an issue. We were all set."

That is, until Gardner heard late Saturday that Webster had declared the whole thing over – no caucuses held after Saturday would count in the final state totals.

Say what?

Gardner, a Romney supporter, immediately got on the horn to Webster and other state party officials to protest what he considered an about-face: When the possibility of postponement had been discussed earlier, he said, he'd been told that Washington County's numbers would not be part of the "national announcement" but would be added later to the final tally.

"If the state Republican Party thinks that by doing a Colonel Klink – saying 'I see nothing' – they can somehow negate the votes of these outlying towns, they're fooling themselves," Gardner said Tuesday. "We're going to have our vote. We're going to do it in the formal process. And we're going to release it."

Ah, but will it matter? According to Chairman Webster, that will be decided only when the Republican State Committee convenes on March 10.

(Continued on page 2)

Were you interviewed for this story? If so, please fill out our accuracy form

Send question/comment to the editors

Further Discussion

Here at PressHerald.com we value our readers and are committed to growing our community by encouraging you to add to the discussion. To ensure conscientious dialogue we have implemented a strict no-bullying policy. To participate, you must follow our Terms of Use.

Questions about the article? Add them below and we’ll try to answer them or do a follow-up post as soon as we can. Technical problems? Email them to us with an exact description of the problem. Make sure to include:
  • Type of computer or mobile device your are using
  • Exact operating system and browser you are viewing the site on (TIP: You can easily determine your operating system here.)