Friday, March 7, 2014
By Steve Mistler email@example.com
Republican state Sen. Nichi Farnham has been running -- literally -- throughout Bangor and Hermon to convince voters in District 32 that she deserves a second term. Geoff Gratwick, her Democratic challenger, has been campaigning on his bicycle.
WHO’S ON THE BALLOT IN MY DISTRICT?
Farnham describes the race as a "healthy competition" between two candidates with different views. Democratic and Republican operatives, however, have ascribed some urgency to the race, along with dozens of others that could affect the balance of power at the State House.
At stake is a Republican agenda that has been laden with change and, at times, controversy.
The largest tax cut in state history was enacted, although not entirely paid for. A contentious overhaul of the state's health insurance laws was passed, along with a charter school bill and initiatives to ease regulation.
Now, Democrats see a chance in November to take back the Legislature, where Republicans hold a 77-70 edge in the House (two members unenrolled, two seats vacant) and 19-15 advantage in the Senate (one unenrolled).
This month, Farnham and four other Republican state senators were targeted in a television ad by the Maine Democratic Party. The ad was absent the collegiality Farnham used to describe her race. It dubbed them "rubber-stampers" of Gov. Paul LePage's "extreme agenda."
The decision to run the ad came after operatives crunched the numbers, evaluating party registration advantages, election results and other factors before identifying Farnham's seat as winnable.
Strategists in both parties have made similar calculations for other swing districts and battleground races. Video, radio and mail ads are queued. Outside interests with a stake in who controls the Legislature may be watching, too.
It's standard procedure every two years as parties vie for control of the State House.
This legislative election, however, is different.
Maine Democratic Party Chairman Ben Grant has described the battle for the Legislature as "one of the most important elections in the history" of the party.
"That's not hyperbole," Grant said.
Democrats aren't monopolizing the urgency. Republicans, who wrested full control of the Legislature for the first time in over three decades in 2010, say they've just started reforming state government. They argue that the initiatives were part of the voter mandate that swept the party into power in 2010. A divided State House in 2013 would blunt their electoral directive, said House Speaker Rep. Robert Nutting, R-Oakland.
"I just don't see Democrats supporting some of the things we want to do," Nutting said. "With this governor in office, it could be two years of not getting anything done. It could be gridlock just like we see in Washington."
For Democrats, stopping the Republican agenda, and specifically LePage, is the priority. They warn that two more years of the governor's unchecked rule will further slash the public safety net and lead to additional privatization of government services, dismantling of organized labor and economic policies that threaten the state's infrastructure and job growth.
"The governor's agenda takes us back on many things that our side has fought for and won over the (last 40 years)," Grant said. "This is a vital election for the Legislature."
There are 54 open seats -- contests with no incumbent -- in the House and 13 in the Senate this election. Some of those districts are considered swing districts, meaning both parties think they can win it. Some races with incumbents are also being targeted.
Grant told the Maine Sunday Telegram that the party is eyeing between 30 and 40 races in the House and Senate. Maine Republican Party Chairman Charlie Webster was more vague but said he was confident the party could grow its majority.
So where are the swing districts?
Party operatives aren't saying. However, publicly available party registration data and electoral history provide some clues. So can the history of money that has been directed to specific races to influence the outcome.
The numbers, however, can't predict outcomes or measure the candidates. The parties monitor a candidate's contact with voters, knowing that hard-working candidates can overcome preset disadvantages such as party registration.
Of the 54 open seats this year, 19 could be battleground races simply because of a narrow voter registration advantage.
Republicans hold seven seats in districts where they have no registration advantage. Three of them will be open contests this election -- Districts 111 (Windham), 60 (Topsham) and 47 (Rockland).
The same goes for District 64, where Rep. Kim Olsen, R-Phippsburg, is seeking a second term against Democratic challenger Jeremy Saxton. Incumbents typically have the edge, but Olsen won the seat by just 74 votes in 2010. Democrats have historically won District 64, holding it for four straight terms prior to 2010.
Rep. Doug Damon, R-Bangor, could find himself in a dogfight in District 16. Damon is facing Democrat John Schneck, a former radio news anchor. Damon also resides in a district where registered Democrats outnumber Republicans.
Democratic House incumbents may also face tough re-election bids. District 109 Rep. Ann Graham, of North Yarmouth, lives in a district where Republicans outnumber Democrats 1,944 to 1,707. Graham, who narrowly won the seat in 2010, is facing off against Susan Austin, a former representative from Gray.
Democrats could lose seats they currently hold but are open races this year. Rep. Robert Hunt, D-Buxton, narrowly won District 131 by two percentage points in 2010. His would-be successor, Ronald Usher, must overcome a disadvantage to beat Republican Donald Marean: There are more registered Republicans in the district.
With more seats in play, a lot of attention will likely go to the House. However, the recent "rubber-stamper" ad shows that the Senate will have battleground districts, too.
Four of the five Republicans targeted in the ads reside in districts where Democrats have a registered-voter advantage.
In District 32, Democrats have a slight advantage. The party also won the seat in 2008. Gratwick has served three terms on the Bangor City Council. People there know him, but they also know Farnham, a school committee member and former mayor.
Similar tussles could unfold in Districts 15, 17, 22 and 25.
In District 17, Sen. Garrett Mason, R-Lisbon Falls, upended a Democratic incumbent in 2010 despite a disadvantage in registered voters. Mason said he'll have to run "like he's coming from behind" to keep the seat and defeat Democratic challenger Colleen Quint, a former assistant attorney general.
Sen. Tom Martin, R-Benton, starts his re-election bid at an immediate disadvantage. Registered Democrats heavily outnumber Republicans in District 25. However, Martin, who owns a contracting business, may be better known than his opponent, Colleen Lachowicz.
The caliber of opponents could also factor into the re-election bids of Sen. Lois Snowe-Mello, R-Poland (District 15) and Chris Rector, R-Thomaston (District 22). Snowe-Mello is being challenged by John Cleveland, who served terms in the Senate between 1990-1998. Rector is taking on Ed Mazurek, a well-known public figure in Rockland, the population center for District 22.
Even if Democrats pick up a few of those seats, they're poised to lose some elsewhere. The party isn't running a candidate in District 12, a seat held by Sen. Bill Diamond, D-Windham.
Sen. Phil Bartlett, D-Gorham, is departing District 6, leaving Democrat James Boyle to defend the seat. Boyle will face Republican Ruth Summers, who is considered a rising star in the party and who is married to Secretary of State Charlie Summers.
THE LEPAGE FACTOR
Other battleground races are as difficult to identify as the outcome of the election. In the end, both sides say, it's about the policies and the quality of candidates.
Democrats are hoping that LePage, a magnet for controversy, will assist their resurgence. The governor has already unintentionally helped with candidate recruitment, Grant said.
"A lot of people don't like what they see out of him and they're (more) willing to make the needed sacrifices to run for office," he said.
Republicans, meanwhile, are confident that their agenda is resonating with voters.
"I don't see any great change," Nutting said. "We'll probably trade some seats, but in the end we're looking to grow our majority."
Staff Writer Steve Mistler can be contacted at 791-6345 or at: